“If state, party and social policy will not be based on morality, then mankind has no future to speak of.”
Here are some examples of how you might use the quote by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in different contexts:
In an essay on ethics and governance
"As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn profoundly stated, 'If state, party and social policy will not be based on morality, then mankind has no future to speak of.' This highlights the critical role that ethical principles must play in shaping policies that affect the collective well-being of society."
In a speech about the importance of integrity in leadership
"We must remember the words of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: 'If state, party and social policy will not be based on morality, then mankind has no future to speak of.' Without a foundation of moral integrity, true progress and trust cannot be achieved in governance."
In a discussion on social justice
"The future of humanity depends on justice and fairness, as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn warned us—'If state, party and social policy will not be based on morality, then mankind has no future to speak of.' Ignoring morality in social policies ultimately leads to decay and conflict."
In a philosophical debate about the role of morality in politics
"Solzhenitsyn’s assertion that 'If state, party and social policy will not be based on morality, then mankind has no future to speak of' challenges us to reconsider whether political actions detached from moral considerations can sustain a stable society."
In a reflection on historical failures
"History reveals many examples where the absence of morality in governance has led to disaster. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s warning that 'If state, party and social policy will not be based on morality, then mankind has no future to speak of' remains as relevant as ever."
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's statement, "If state, party and social policy will not be based on morality, then mankind has no future to speak of," emphasizes the fundamental role that ethics must play in governance and social organization.
He suggests that without a moral foundation guiding political and social institutions, humanity risks facing decline or collapse. By highlighting "state, party and social policy," Solzhenitsyn points to various pillars of societal structure that shape human life on large scales. His warning implies that power and policies devoid of ethical considerations can lead to injustice, oppression, and ultimately the erosion of human dignity and progress.
This quote encapsulates his broader critique of totalitarian regimes and ideological systems that prioritize power over principles, and stresses the necessity for leaders and societies to uphold moral integrity to ensure a sustainable and hopeful future for mankind.
“The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either -- but right through every human heart -- and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. And even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained”
“If humanism were right in declaring that man is born to be happy, he would not be born to die. Since his body is doomed to die, his task on earth evidently must be of a more spiritual nature. It cannot the unrestrained enjoyment of everyday life. It cannot be the search for the best ways to obtain material goods and then cheerfully get the most out of them. It has to be the fulfillment of a permanent, earnest duty so that one's life journey may become an experience of moral growth, so that one may leave life a better human being than one started it. It is imperative to review the table of widespread human values. Its present incorrectness is astounding. It is not possible that assessment of the President's performance be reduced to the question of how much money one makes or of unlimited availability of gasoline. Only voluntary, inspired self-restraint can raise man above the world stream of materialism.”
“Children write essays in school about the unhappy, tragic, doomed life of Anna Karenina. But was Anna really unhappy? She chose passion and she paid for her passion—that's happiness! She was a free, proud human being. But what if during peacetime a lot of greatcoats and peaked caps burst into the house where you were born and live, and ordered the whole family to leave house and town in twenty-four hours, with only what your feeble hands can carry?... You open your doors, call in the passers-by from the streets and ask them to buy things from you, or to throw you a few pennies to buy bread with... With ribbon in her hair, your daughter sits down at the piano for the last time to play Mozart. But she bursts into tears and runs away. So why should I read Anna Karenina again? Maybe it's enough—what I've experienced. Where can people read about us? Us? Only in a hundred years?"They deported all members of the nobility from Leningrad. (There were a hundred thousand of them, I suppose. But did we pay much attention? What kind of wretched little ex-nobles were they, the ones who remained? Old people and children, the helpless ones.) We knew this, we looked on and did nothing. You see, we weren't the victims." "You bought their pianos?""We may even have bought their pianos. Yes, of course we bought them."Oleg could now see that this woman was not yet even fifty. Yet anyone walking past her would have said she was an old woman. A lock of smooth old woman's hair, quite incurable, hung down from under her white head-scarf."But when you were deported, what was it for? What was the charge?""Why bother to think up a charge? 'Socially harmful' or 'socially dangerous element'—S.D.E.', they called it. Special decrees, just marked by letters of the alphabet. So it was quite easy. No trial necessary." "And what about your husband? Who was he?""Nobody. He played the flute in the Leningrad Philharmonic. He liked to talk when he'd had a few drinks."“…We knew one family with grown-up children, a son and a daughter, both Komsomol (Communist youth members). Suddenly the whole family was put down for deportation to Siberia. The children rushed to the Komsomol district office. 'Protect us!' they said. 'Certainly we'll protect you,' they were told. 'Just write on this piece of paper: As from today's date I ask not to be considered the son, or the daughter, of such-and-such parents. I renounce them as socially harmful elements and I promise in the future to have nothing whatever to do with them and to maintain no communication with them.”
“[He] understood the people in a new way...The people is not everyone who speaks our language, nor yet the elect marked by the fiery stamp of genius. Not by birth, not by the work of one's hands, not by the wings of education is one elected into the people.But by one's inner self.Everyone forges his inner self year after year.One must try to temper, to cut, to polish one's soul so as to become a human being. And thereby become a tiny particle of one's own people.”
“Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: "Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened." Since then I have spent well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: "Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.”
“Let us not forget that violence does not and cannot exist by itself; it is invariably intertwined with the lie. They are linked in the most intimate, most organic and profound fashion: violence cannot conceal itself behind anything except lies, and lies have nothing to maintain them save violence. Anyone who has once proclaimed violence as his method must inexorably choose the lie as his principle.”