“Famines are easy to prevent if there is a serious effort to do so, and a democratic government, facing elections and criticisms from opposition parties and independent newspapers, cannot help but make such an effort. Not surprisingly, while India continued to have famines under British rule right up to independence … they disappeared suddenly with the establishment of a multiparty democracy and a free press. … a free press and an active political opposition constitute the best early-warning system a country threaten by famines can have”
Explore This Quote Further
Quote Analysis
In this quote by Amartya Sen, he emphasizes the importance of democracy, elections, opposition parties, and a free press in preventing famines. Sen highlights the contrast between India's experience of famines under British rule and their disappearance after the establishment of a multiparty democracy and free press. He suggests that the presence of a free press and an active political opposition can serve as an effective early-warning system for countries at risk of famine. This quote underscores the role of political freedoms and accountability in addressing and preventing humanitarian crises like famines.
Modern Relevance
In today's global society, the words of economist Amartya Sen still hold significant relevance. The importance of a democratic government, an active political opposition, and a free press in preventing famines cannot be understated.
In an era where transparency and accountability are crucial, the early-warning system provided by a free press and political opposition is more important than ever. By shining a light on potential issues and advocating for solutions, these institutions can play a critical role in preventing crises such as famines.
As we continue to address complex global challenges, the lessons learned from history remind us of the power of democracy, freedom of the press, and political diversity in safeguarding the well-being of vulnerable populations.
Amartya Sen on the Role of Democracy in Preventing Famines
In his quote, Amartya Sen emphasizes the importance of democratic institutions in preventing famines. He argues that a government facing elections and criticisms from opposition parties and the media is more likely to take action to prevent famines. Sen points to the example of India, where famines continued under British rule but disappeared after the establishment of a multiparty democracy and a free press. Sen believes that a free press and an active political opposition serve as crucial early-warning systems for countries at risk of famine.
Reflection Questions:
In light of the quote by Amartya Sen, it is important to reflect on the role of democracy, the presence of a free press, and political opposition in preventing famines. Consider the following questions:
- How important do you think democratic governance is in preventing famines compared to other forms of government?
- Do you believe that a free press is a crucial component in early warning systems for preventing famines? Why or why not?
- In what ways can political opposition contribute to preventing famines in a country?
- How do you think the principles mentioned by Sen can be applied in modern contexts to prevent famines globally?
- Do you agree with the idea that famines are easy to prevent if there is a serious effort to do so, or do you believe there are other factors at play?
Similar quotes
“The notion of human right builds on our shared humanity. These rights are not derived from the citizenship of any country, or the membership of any nation, but are presumed to be claims or entitlements of every human being. They differ, therefore, from constitutionally created rights guaranteed for specific people.”
“To conclude this discussion, assessment of justice demands engagement with the 'eyes of mankind',first, because we may variously identify with the others elsewhere and not just with our local community;second, because our choices and actions may affect the lives of others far as well as near;and third,because what they see from their respective perspective of history and geography may help us to overcome our own parochialism.”
“While I am interested both in economics and in philosophy, the union of my interests in the two fields far exceeds their intersection”
“A defeated argument that refuses to be obliterated can remain very alive.”
“It is important to reclaim for humanity the ground that has been taken from it by various arbitrarily narrow formulations of the demands of rationality”
“The increasing tendency towards seeing people in terms of one dominant ‘identity’ (‘this is your duty as an American’, ‘you must commit these acts as a Muslim’, or ‘as a Chinese you should give priority to this national engagement’) is not only an imposition of an external and arbitrary priority, but also the denial of an important liberty of a person who can decide on their respective loyalties to different groups (to all of which he or she belongs).”