“Famines are easy to prevent if there is a serious effort to do so, and a democratic government, facing elections and criticisms from opposition parties and independent newspapers, cannot help but make such an effort. Not surprisingly, while India continued to have famines under British rule right up to independence … they disappeared suddenly with the establishment of a multiparty democracy and a free press. … a free press and an active political opposition constitute the best early-warning system a country threaten by famines can have”
Quote Analysis
In this quote by Amartya Sen, he emphasizes the importance of democracy, elections, opposition parties, and a free press in preventing famines. Sen highlights the contrast between India's experience of famines under British rule and their disappearance after the establishment of a multiparty democracy and free press. He suggests that the presence of a free press and an active political opposition can serve as an effective early-warning system for countries at risk of famine. This quote underscores the role of political freedoms and accountability in addressing and preventing humanitarian crises like famines.
Modern Relevance
In today's global society, the words of economist Amartya Sen still hold significant relevance. The importance of a democratic government, an active political opposition, and a free press in preventing famines cannot be understated.
In an era where transparency and accountability are crucial, the early-warning system provided by a free press and political opposition is more important than ever. By shining a light on potential issues and advocating for solutions, these institutions can play a critical role in preventing crises such as famines.
As we continue to address complex global challenges, the lessons learned from history remind us of the power of democracy, freedom of the press, and political diversity in safeguarding the well-being of vulnerable populations.
Amartya Sen on the Role of Democracy in Preventing Famines
In his quote, Amartya Sen emphasizes the importance of democratic institutions in preventing famines. He argues that a government facing elections and criticisms from opposition parties and the media is more likely to take action to prevent famines. Sen points to the example of India, where famines continued under British rule but disappeared after the establishment of a multiparty democracy and a free press. Sen believes that a free press and an active political opposition serve as crucial early-warning systems for countries at risk of famine.
Reflection Questions:
In light of the quote by Amartya Sen, it is important to reflect on the role of democracy, the presence of a free press, and political opposition in preventing famines. Consider the following questions:
- How important do you think democratic governance is in preventing famines compared to other forms of government?
- Do you believe that a free press is a crucial component in early warning systems for preventing famines? Why or why not?
- In what ways can political opposition contribute to preventing famines in a country?
- How do you think the principles mentioned by Sen can be applied in modern contexts to prevent famines globally?
- Do you agree with the idea that famines are easy to prevent if there is a serious effort to do so, or do you believe there are other factors at play?
Similar quotes
“To prosper, a zoo needs parliamentary government, democratic elections, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of association, rule of law and everything else enshrined in India's Constitution. Impossible to enjoy the animals otherwise. Long-term, bad politics is bad for business.”
“They were not mentioned in the Declaration of Independence, they were absent in the Constitution and they were invisible in the new political democracy. They were the women of early America.”
“People who get up early in the morning cause war, death and famine.”
“Malone: Me father died of starvation in Ireland in the black 47. Maybe you've heard of it.Violet: The Famine?Malone: No, the starvation. When a country is full o food, and exporting it, there can be no famine.”
“India had a very long independence movement. It started in 1886, [with] the first generation of Western-educated Indians. They were all liberals. They followed the Liberal Party in Britain, and they were very proud of their knowledge of parliamentary systems, parliamentary manners. They were big debaters. They [had], as it were, a long apprenticeship in training for being in power. Even when Gandhi made it a mass movement, the idea of elective representatives, elected working committees, elected leadership, all that stayed because basically Indians wanted to impress the British that they were going to be as good as the British were at running a parliamentary democracy. And that helped quite a lot.”