“Female knowledge of objectification usually stops at a necessary but superficial understanding: beauty is rewarded and lack of beauty is punished. The punishments are understood as personal misfortune; they are not seem as systematic, institutional, or historical. Women do not understand that they are also punished through sexual use for being beautiful; and women do not understand the lengths to which men go to protect themselves and their society from contamination by ugly women who do not induce a lustful desire to punish, violate, or destroy, though men manage to punish, violate, or destroy these women anyway.”
In this quote by feminist author Andrea Dworkin, she delves into the concept of objectification and the societal attitudes towards women's beauty. Dworkin argues that women have a limited understanding of objectification, primarily seeing it as a personal issue related to beauty standards. She highlights the deeper, systemic nature of objectification, explaining how women are punished not only for lacking beauty but also for being too beautiful. Dworkin emphasizes that women are often used for sexual gratification based on their appearance and that society goes to great lengths to protect itself from women who do not fit conventional beauty standards. This quote sheds light on the complex, often overlooked ways in which women are objectified and punished in society.
Andrea Dworkin's quote highlights the issue of women's objectification and the consequences of society's narrow beauty standards. In today's society, women are still often valued primarily for their physical appearance, and punished for not meeting unrealistic beauty ideals. This quote challenges us to consider the ways in which women are devalued and mistreated based on their looks, and the systemic nature of this objectification. It emphasizes the importance of recognizing and addressing the harmful effects of objectification on women's lives.
In this quote by Andrea Dworkin, she delves into the idea that female knowledge of objectification often remains superficial, focusing solely on beauty being rewarded and lack of beauty being punished. Dworkin argues that women fail to recognize the systematic, institutional, and historical aspects of objectification, as well as the ways in which they are punished for being beautiful. She also highlights the extreme measures men take to protect themselves from "ugly" women, even though they still find ways to punish them.
In her quote, Andrea Dworkin sheds light on the complex dynamics at play in how women are objectified and punished based on their beauty or lack thereof. This calls for a deeper reflection on societal norms, gender roles, and power dynamics. Here are some questions to ponder:
“Feminists know that if women are paid equal wages for equal work, women will gain sexual as well as economic independence. But feminists have refused to face the fact that in a woman-hating social system, women will never be paid equal wages. Men in all their institutions of power are sustained by the sex labor and sexual subordination of women. The sex labor of women must be maintained; and systematic low wages for sex-neutral work effectively force women to sell sex to survive. The economic system that pays women lower wages than it pays men actually punishes women for working outside marriage or prostitution, since women work hard for low wages and still must sell sex. The economic system that punishes women for working outside the bedroom by paying low wages contributes significantly to women's perception that the sexual serving of men is a necessary part of any woman's life: or how else could she live? Feminists appear to think that equal pay for equal work is a simple reform, whereas it no reform at all; it is revolution. Feminists have refused to face the fact that equal pay for equal work is impossible as long as men rule women, and right-wing women have refused to forget it.”
“Men have constructed female sexuality and in so doing have annihilated the chance for sexual intelligence in women. Sexual intelligence cannot live in the shallow, predestined sexuality men have counterfeiteed for women.”
“Male dominance in society always means that out of public sight, in the private, ahistorical world of men with women, men are sexually dominating women.”
“Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.' (Leviticus 18:22). That means simply that it is foul to do to other men what men habitually, proudly, manfully do to women: use them as inanimate, empty, concave things; fuck them into submission; subordinate them through sex.”
“We see a major trade in women, we see the torture of women as a form of entertainment, and we see women also suffering the injury of objectification—that is to say we are dehumanized. We are treated as if we are subhuman, and that is a precondition for violence against us.I live in a country where if you film any act of humiliation or torture, and if the victim is a woman, the film is both entertainment and it is protected speech. Now that tells me something about what it means to be a woman citizen in this country, and the meaning of being second class.When your rape is entertainment, your worthlessness is absolute. You have reached the nadir of social worthlessness. The civil impact of pornography on women is staggering. It keeps us socially silent, it keeps us socially compliant, it keeps us afraid in neighborhoods; and it creates a vast hopelessness for women, a vast despair. One lives inside a nightmare of sexual abuse that is both actual and potential, and you have the great joy of knowing that your nightmare is someone else’s freedom and someone else’s fun.”
“She will try to find the nice way to exercise intelligence. But intelligence is not ladylike. Intelligence is full of excesses. Rigorous intelligene abhors sentimentality, and women must be sentimental to value the dreadful silliness of the men around them. Morbid intelligence abhors the cheery sunlight of positive thinking and eternal sweetness; and women must be sunlight and cheery and sweet, or the woman could not bribe her way with smiles through a day. Wild intelligence abhors any narrow world; and the world of women must stay narrow, or the woman is an outlaw. No woman could be Nietzsche or Rimbaud without ending up in a whorehouse or lobotomized. Any vital intelligence has passionate questions, aggressive answers; but women cannot be explorers; there can be no Lewis or Clark of the female mind.”