“A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled.”
Explore This Quote Further
Quote Analysis
In this quote, Barnett Cocks highlights the limitations of committees in fostering innovation and progress. The metaphor of a cul-de-sac conveys the idea that committees can often lead to a dead end for ideas, stifling creativity and preventing meaningful change. The image of ideas being "quietly strangled" suggests that the bureaucratic nature of committees can stifle dissenting opinions and hinder the development of new, unconventional solutions. Overall, the quote underscores the challenges of decision-making by committee and the importance of maintaining open-mindedness and flexibility in group settings.
The Pitfalls of Committees
The quote by Barnett Cocks highlights the common criticism of committees - that they often stifle creativity and progress by over-analyzing ideas or getting bogged down in endless discussions. In today's fast-paced and dynamic world, where innovation and quick decision-making are key, this quote serves as a reminder of the importance of avoiding the pitfalls of excessive bureaucracy and inefficiency that can sometimes accompany committee-led processes. Whether in business, government, or any other organization, it is crucial to strike a balance between collaboration and autonomy to ensure that ideas can flourish rather than be suffocated.
Quote about committees
Here is an example of a quote by Barnett Cocks about committees:
“A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled.” - Barnett Cocks
Reflection Questions
When considering the quote "A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled" by Barnett Cocks, it prompts us to reflect on the potential drawbacks of group decision-making processes. Some questions that may arise include:
- How have committees or group settings hindered or stifled the development of innovative ideas in your own experiences?
- Are there ways to mitigate the risk of idea stagnation within committees, such as setting clear objectives or encouraging diverse perspectives?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of decision-making by committee versus individual autonomy when it comes to fostering creativity and progress?
- Have you witnessed instances where committee-based decisions have led to positive outcomes or breakthrough innovations despite the potential pitfalls mentioned in the quote?
- How can organizations strike a balance between leveraging collective wisdom and expertise while avoiding the pitfalls of idea suppression within committee structures?
Similar quotes
“Over the years I've really believed when you think you're in danger, you are probably not and when you have no idea, you probably are.”
“I would never lie about shoes. I have morals.”
“An actor must never be afraid to make a fool of himself.”
“A clearly written and passionately argued indictment of centuries of antisemitism that contributed to Nazi extermination of the Jews. Wilensky has read widely, thought deeply, and writes persuasively in placing the Holocaust into the larger context of the history of Western Christianity. What he concludes is deeply disturbing and must be confronted seriously by scholars and public alike. Six Million Crucifixions is an important book for our-—or any—age of religious conflict and intolerance.”
“How did you not know they broke up? You usually monitor his social media like he's al-Qaeda and you're the CIA.”
“Slang is the suitcase of the damned, my dear. CHECK IT.”