“The human species is an animal species without very much variation within it, and it is idle and futile to imagine that a voyage to Tibet, say, will discover an entirely different harmony with nature or eternity.”
In this quote by Christopher Hitchens, he argues against the idea of seeking a unique or superior connection to nature or eternity through travels to different places. Hitchens dismisses the notion of human beings being fundamentally different from one another based on their geographic location, asserting that the human species lacks significant variation. He suggests that the quest for a deeper harmony with nature or eternity is ultimately a futile endeavor as it is inherent to the human condition, rather than dependent on external factors like location. This statement challenges the romanticized idea of finding a utopia or transcendent experience in distant lands, emphasizing the commonality of human experience across cultures and regions.
In today's interconnected world, Christopher Hitchens' statement about the human species lacking significant variation holds true. Despite technological advancements and globalization, human nature remains consistent across different cultures and societies. The pursuit of exotic or spiritual experiences in distant lands may not lead to a fundamentally different understanding of our place in the world or connection to nature.
"The human species is an animal species without very much variation within it, and it is idle and futile to imagine that a voyage to Tibet, say, will discover an entirely different harmony with nature or eternity.” - Christopher Hitchens
Christopher Hitchens brings up an interesting perspective on the human species and our connection to nature. Reflect on the following questions:
“The rules that govern competition between species are (and must be) very different from the rules that govern competition within species.”
“In the United States both scholars and the general public have been conditioned to viewing human races as natural and separate divisions within the human species based on visible physical differences. With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century, however, it has become clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g. DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic "racial" groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. This means that there is greater variation within "racial" groups than between them. In neighboring populations there is much overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions. Throughout history whenever different groups have come into contact, they have interbred. The continued sharing of genetic materials has maintained all of humankind as a single species.”
“Humanity is part of nature, a species that evolved among other species. The more closely we identify ourselves with the rest of life, the more quickly we will be able to discover the sources of human sensibility and acquire the knowledge on which an enduring ethic, a sense of preferred direction, can be built.”
“Having people in different optimal environments increases the chances of survival of the human race as a whole. It is nature's way to preserve her species.”
“Of course he would count the time that we'd been two entirely different species.”