“Middling monsters died at the point of pitchforks, burned with torches, or at the butt of silver-capped canes wielded by angry, geriatric Poles. Middling people were dime-a-dozen, emptied souls, shorn sheeple, human husks. A good monster didn’t worry about what it was doing; it just did it. A true predator didn’t worry about guilt, or being popular, or anything. It just cruised along, living for the kill, surviving. A good person, well, she’d put a bullet in her head or weigh her feet down and throw herself into the Chicago River, holding her breath until she went to the sludgy, filthy bottom, and had to open wide and breathe water until she died.”
Quote Analysis
In this quote by D. T. Neal, the speaker reflects on the nature of monsters and people. The speaker contrasts "middling monsters" who meet their demise at the hands of humans, to "good monsters" who simply act without remorse or hesitation. Similarly, the speaker contrasts "middling people" who are portrayed as soulless and weak, to "good people" who are depicted as being overwhelmed by despair. This passage delves into the complexities of human nature and poses thought-provoking questions about morality and survival.
Modern Relevance:
In this quote from D. T. Neal, the idea of monsters versus humans is explored in a dark and visceral way. The concept of the "good monster" and the "good person" is contrasted, with the former being portrayed as unapologetically true to its nature, while the latter is depicted as weighed down by societal expectations and self-doubt. This dichotomy raises questions about identity, morality, and the pressures of conformity in contemporary society.
Examples of Usage
The quote illustrates how the author contrasts middling monsters with true predators and middling people with good people. The vivid imagery paints a stark picture of the different perceptions of these beings in the fictional world created by D. T. Neal.
Reflection Questions
This excerpt explores the concept of monsters, people, predators, and the idea of morality. It delves into the differences between them and poses questions about guilt, survival, and the worth of one's own life. Here are some reflection questions to consider:
- What do you think the author is trying to convey about the nature of monsters, people, and predators in this passage?
- How do you interpret the idea of a "good monster" versus a "good person"?
- Do you agree with the statement that a good monster doesn't worry about what it's doing, while a good person may feel guilt or contemplate self-harm?
- How does this passage challenge conventional ideas of morality and ethics?
- Can you relate this excerpt to real-life experiences or situations where individuals may struggle with feelings of emptiness or the pressures of conforming to societal norms?
Similar quotes
“Instead of killing herself, I wondered, could a person just shrink and crumple until she became nothing, until her traits and quirks wasted along with her body, until one day you realized that she had faded away?”
“If I had learned anything by hanging out with her and her friends, it was that once you got up close to people, you realized that everyone - no matter how popular he or she might be - was just a living, breathing human being...”
“She said nothing for a moment, unsure what exactly to say. She loved him with every breath she took. She would do anything for him. How could she word her affections? Moisture assembled in her eyes, and, to her surprise, a tear trickled down her cheek. There were many things she’d like to say, but she didn’t know how.”
“Not only did the angry villagers hound their monsters to the edge of town, they reproached her for being vulnerable to the torches.”
“She wanted to have him hold her and tell her all the demons were pretend, that there was no monster in her closet, that everything would be okay. But that was a lie. The demon was in her head, telling her she was too fat. She had to get the demon out. But she couldn't do it by herself.”