“A true Democratic Spirit is up there with religious faith and emotional maturity and all those other top-of-the-Maslow-Pyramid-type qualities that people spend their whole lives working on. A Democratic Spirit's constituent rigor and humility and self-honesty are, in fact, so hard to maintain on certain issues that it's almost irresistibly tempting to fall in with some established dogmatic camp and to follow that camp's line on the issue and to let your position harden within the camp and become inflexible and to believe that he other camps are either evil or insane and to spend all your time and energy trying to shout over them.”
Explore This Quote Further
Analysis
In this quote from David Foster Wallace, he emphasizes the challenge of maintaining a true Democratic Spirit. He compares it to qualities like religious faith and emotional maturity, placing it at the top of the Maslow hierarchy. Wallace highlights the difficulty of staying open-minded, humble, and self-honest, especially when faced with polarizing issues. He warns against the temptation to align oneself with a dogmatic camp, which can lead to inflexibility, demonization of opposing viewpoints, and hostile interactions. Wallace ultimately emphasizes the importance of putting in the effort to maintain a Democratic Spirit, even when it is difficult.
The Importance of a Democratic Spirit in Today's Society
In today's highly polarized political climate, the concept of a true Democratic Spirit, as described by David Foster Wallace, holds immense modern relevance. The ability to maintain rigor, humility, and self-honesty in our beliefs and actions is crucial for fostering constructive dialogue and collaboration in the face of differing viewpoints. This quote serves as a reminder of the dangers of falling into dogmatic camps and the importance of actively working towards open-mindedness and understanding in our interactions with others.
Example of Usage
In his famous essay, David Foster Wallace discusses the importance of a true Democratic Spirit in maintaining humility, self-honesty, and open-mindedness on complex issues. He warns against the temptation to fall into dogmatic camps and close oneself off to differing perspectives.
Reflection Questions:
Reflecting on the quote by David Foster Wallace, consider the following questions to explore your own beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors towards maintaining a true Democratic Spirit:
Rigor and Humility: How do you approach discussions or debates on issues where you may have strong opinions? Are you willing to challenge your own beliefs and remain open to differing perspectives?
Self-honesty: How often do you reflect on your own biases or preconceived notions when engaging in political discourse? Are you able to admit when you may be wrong or when your views may need reevaluation?
Dogmatism vs. Flexibility: In what ways do you see yourself falling into the trap of aligning too closely with a particular ideological camp? How can you maintain a sense of flexibility and open-mindedness in your political beliefs?
View of Others: Do you tend to demonize those who hold opposing views or consider them as fundamentally flawed? How can you cultivate empathy and understanding towards those with differing perspectives?
Effective Communication: How can you strive to engage in discussions with others in a respectful and constructive manner, rather than resorting to shouting matches or dismissing opposing viewpoints?
Similar quotes
“Some people, from what I've seen, boo, when they lie, they become very still and centered and their gaze very concentrated and intense. They try to dominate the person they lie to. The person to whom they're lying. Another type becomes fluttery and insubstantial and punctuates his lie with little self-deprecating motions and sounds, as if credulity were the same as pity. Some bury the lie in so many digressions and asides that they like try to slip the lie in there through all the extraneous data like a tiny bug through a windowscreen ... Then there are what I might call your Kamikaze-style liars. These'll tell you a surreal and fundamentally incredible lie, and then pretend a crisis of conscience and retract the original lie, and then offer you the like they really want you to buy instead, so the real lie'll appear a some kind of concession, a settlement with through. That type's mercifully easy to see through ... Or then the type who sort of overelaborates on the lie, buttresses it with rococo formations of detail and amendment, and that's how you can always tell ... So Now I've established a subtype of the over-elaborator type. This is the liar who used to be an over-elaborator and but has somehow snapped to the fact that rococo elaborations give him away every time, so he changes and now lies tersely, sparely, seeming somehow bored, like what he's saying is too obviously true to waste time on.”
“De Tocqueville's thrust is that it's in the democratic citizen's nature to be like a leaf that doesn't believe in the tree it's part of.”
“My whole life I've been a fraud. I'm not exaggerating. Pretty much all I've ever done all the time is try to create a certain impression of me in other people. Mostly to be liked or admired. It's a little more complicated than that, maybe. But when you come right down to it it's to be liked, loved. Admired, approved of, applauded, whatever. You get the idea.”
“The whole issue was almost unbelievably meaningless and small. He thought about the word “meaning” and tried to summon up his baby’s face without looking at the photo, but all he could get was the heft of a full diaper and the plastic mobile over his crib turning in the breeze that the box fan in the doorway made. He imagined that the clock’s second hand possessed awareness and knew that it was a second hand and that its job was to go around and around inside a circle of numbers forever at the same slow, unvarying machinelike rate, going no place it hadn’t already been a million times before, and imagining the second hand was so awful it made his breath catch in his throat, and he looked quickly around to see if any of the examiners near him had heard it or were looking at him.”
“That 99 of compulsive thinkers’ thinking is about themselves that 99 of this self-directed thinking consists of imagining and then getting ready for things that are going to happen to them and then weirdly that if they stop to think about it that 100 of the things they spend 99 of their time and energy imagining and trying to prepare for all the contingencies and consequences are never good. Then that this connects interestingly with the early-sobriety urge to pray for the literal loss of one’s mind. In short that 99 of the head’s thinking activity consists of trying to scare the everliving shit out of itself.”
“We're all—especially those of us who are educated and have read a lot and have watched TV critically—in a very self-conscious and sort of worldly and sophisticated time, but also a time when we seem terribly afraid of other people's reactions to us and very desperate to control how people interpret us. Everyone is extremely conscious of manipulating how they come off in the media; they want to structure what they say so that the reader or audience will interpret it in the way that is most favorable to them. What's interesting to me is that this isn't all that new. This was the project of the Sophists in Athens, and this is what Socrates and Plato thought was so completely evil. The Sophists had this idea: Forget this idea of what's true or not—what you want to do is rhetoric; you want to be able to persuade the audience and have the audience think you're smart and cool. And Socrates and Plato, basically their whole idea is, "Bullshit. There is such a thing as truth, and it's not all just how to say what you say so that you get a good job or get laid, or whatever it is people think they want.”