“Through God's grace we become those who believe and love. But in faith and love we who were once possessors become beings once more, and as such become those who are about to be, those whom God builds. We are taken away from ourselves to our own best advantage. Just for this reason we are free for the neighbor, free for the service of works.”
Analysis of Eberhard Jungel's Quote
In this quote, Eberhard Jungel emphasizes the transformative power of faith and love in shaping individuals into better versions of themselves. He highlights how belief and love allow us to transcend our former self-centered ways and become more open to serving others. By emphasizing the importance of being "free for the neighbor" and for engaging in acts of service, Jungel underscores the idea that true faith and love lead to a selfless and outward-focused way of life. Ultimately, he suggests that through the grace of God, we are constantly being molded and shaped into the people we are meant to be.
Modern Relevance of Eberhard Jungel's Words
Eberhard Jungel's words emphasize the transformative power of faith and love, which enable individuals to be freed from self-centeredness and become vessels for serving others. This concept remains relevant in modern times as it speaks to the importance of selflessness, compassion, and service towards one's community and the world at large. By focusing on belief, love, and service, individuals can find purpose and fulfillment in their lives while making a positive impact on the lives of others.
Reflection on God's Grace by Eberhard Jungel
"Through God's grace we become those who believe and love. But in faith and love we who were once possessors become beings once more, and as such become those who are about to be, those whom God builds. We are taken away from ourselves to our own best advantage. Just for this reason we are free for the neighbor, free for the service of works.” - Eberhard Jungel"
Reflection Questions:
As we reflect on Eberhard Jungel's words, we are challenged to consider our own transformation through God's grace. Here are some questions to ponder:
- How has God's grace transformed my beliefs and love?
- In what ways have I experienced a shift from being a possessive individual to one who is open to God's building in my life?
- Am I truly free for my neighbor and the service of good works? If not, what is holding me back?
- How can I continue to embrace the process of becoming more like Christ, being taken away from myself for my own best advantage?
Similar quotes
“The Savior’s was a life of service. When we serve our neighbor, we help those who are in need. In the process we may find solutions to our own difficulties. As we emulate the Savior, we show our love to our Heavenly Father and His Son, Jesus Christ, and we become more like Them.”
“Why are we so afraid when we think about death? Death is only dreadful for those who live in dread and fear of it. Death is not wild and terrible, if only we can be still and hold fast to God's Word. Death is not bitter, if we have not become bitter ourselves. Death is grace, the greatest gift of grace that God gives to people who believe in Him.”
“Sometimes we fight who we are, struggling against ourselves and our natures. But we must learn to accept who we are and appreciate who we become. We must love ourselves for what and who we are, and believe in our talents.”
“Who we are and who we become depends, in part, on whom we love.”
“What would white people become if they (we) actually confronted the fact that being white was not inherent in a person, in ourselves and others, but actually a demand that others make on us, a role we must play to fulfill a certain responsibility? Part of what is demanded is that we see others as different, yet attribute that difference to those others and not to ourselves, who are told to see it. Who would white people become if they saw their own eye as an active agent in the production of race though that eye's attribution to others? The so-called colorblindness that has become a prevalent notion these days would be impossible. Is the essence of race, for which color is a symbol (of the imposed categorization), exists in the eye itself and not in the object seen by the eye, which has its own qualities, to what could the eye be blinding itself? Who would we become if we saw those others not as different but as living under an imposition of difference? Who would we become if we saw that imposition as something in which we were not only implicated but active agents in producing? Who would we become if we sought to interpose ourselves in that process of imposition, to obstruct it in its primordial moment? Who would white people become if they saw themselves through the eyes of those on whom they impose themselves?”