“The Orient and Islam have a kind of extrareal, phenomenologically reduced status that puts them out of reach of everyone except the Western expert. From the beginning of Western speculation about the Orient, the one thing the orient could not do was to represent itself. Evidence of the Orient was credible only after it had passed through and been made firm by the refining fire of the Orientalist’s work.”
In this quote, Edward W. Said discusses the way in which the Orient and Islam have been portrayed and represented by Western experts, specifically Orientalists. Said argues that Westerners have historically depicted the East as inherently different and exotic, creating a perception that only Western experts can accurately represent these cultures.
Said suggests that the Orientalist's work is essential in making the Orient "credible" to Western audiences, implying that without this intermediary, the true nature of these cultures remains inaccessible and intangible. This quote highlights the power dynamics at play in the representation of non-Western cultures, emphasizing the role of the Western expert in shaping perceptions and understanding of the East. Said's critique challenges the notion that the East can only be understood and interpreted through a Western lens, calling into question the authenticity and accuracy of these representations.
In today's globalized world, Edward W. Said's perspective on Orientalism continues to hold relevance. The idea that the Orient and Islam are often misrepresented or exoticized by Western experts highlights a power dynamic that still exists in various sectors of society. This quote challenges us to critically examine how certain cultures and regions are portrayed and understood, emphasizing the importance of diverse and authentic representation.
In his seminal work "Orientalism," Edward W. Said criticizes the Western perception of the Orient as something exotic and mysterious that can only be understood through the lens of the Western expert. Said argues that Western speculation about the Orient has led to a distorted and limited view of Eastern cultures, as they have been misrepresented and appropriated by Orientalists. The quote highlights the power dynamics at play in the representation of the Orient and the need for more authentic and nuanced portrayals of non-Western societies.
This quote by Edward W. Said highlights the power dynamics and representation issues between the West and the Orient. It raises questions about who has the authority to speak for a culture or region, and how this can impact perceptions and understandings. Consider the following questions as you reflect on this quote:
“Instead of Orientals being the passive objects of the Western gaze, we must study the West. The way Orientals saw it must be a subject for deep investigation. Occidentalism is the other side of Orientalism”
“Orientalism is after all a system for citing works and authors . __ Orientalism”
“Every writer on the Orient (and this is true even of Homer) assumes some Oriental precedent, some previous knowledge of the Orient, to which he refers and on which he relies. Additionally, each work on the Orient affiliates itself with other works, with audiences, with institutions, with the Orient itself. The ensemble of relationships between works, audiences, and some particular aspects of the Orient therefore constitutes an analyzable formation[…]whose presence in time, in discourse, in institutions (schools, libraries, foreign services) gives it strength and authority.”
“Japan is probably the best... example of the abandonment of an ancient and nature-oriented ethos for the spirit of progress, Western style.”
“Modern Orientalism embodies a systematic discipline of accumulation. Far from this being exclusively an intellectual or theoretical feature, it made Orientalism tend fatally towards the systematic accumulation of human beings and territories. To reconstruct a dead or lost Oriental language meant ultimately to reconstruct a dead or neglected Orient; it also meant that reconstructive precision, science, even imagination could prepare the way for what armies, administrators, and bureaucracies would later do on the ground.”