“I will say this quite plainly, what truly human is -and don't be afraid of this word- love. And I mean it even with everything that burdens love or, i could say it better, responsibility is actually love, as Pascal said: 'without concupiscence' [without lust]... love exists without worrying being loved.”
In this quote, Emmanuel Levinas explores the essence of what it means to be truly human, identifying love as the core attribute. He emphasizes that love should not be feared, even when it carries the weight of responsibility. Levinas draws on Pascal’s distinction between love and concupiscence (lust), arguing that authentic love transcends selfish desire. Instead, true love is unconditional and selfless, existing independently of any need for reciprocation or assurance that it will be returned. Responsibility, in this context, is not a burden but an expression of genuine love, reflecting a deep ethical commitment to the Other without expectation or demand. This perspective reframes human relationships as fundamentally ethical acts rooted in self-giving rather than self-interest.
Emmanuel Levinas’s reflection on love emphasizes its fundamental role in human existence, highlighting responsibility as an expression of love beyond selfish desires. Here are some ways to use this quote in context:
When discussing the ethical dimensions of relationships:
“Levinas reminds us that ‘what truly human is… love,’ underscoring that responsibility towards others is a pure form of love that does not depend on being loved in return.”
In a philosophical debate on the nature of love:
“According to Levinas, love transcends concupiscence; it is not driven by lust but by a selfless responsibility, making it the essence of what it means to be human.”
Reflecting on personal growth and moral duty:
“I resonate with Levinas’s idea that responsibility itself is love — it calls us to care for others without expectation, embodying a truly human virtue.”
Writing about altruism in ethics or religious studies:
“Levinas articulates a vision of love that is free from ‘worrying about being loved,’ a concept echoed in many spiritual traditions that value selfless compassion.”
“Faith is not a question of the existence or non-existence of God. It is believing that love without reward is valuable.”
“Love remains a relation with the Other that turns into need, transcendent exteriority of the other, of the beloved. But love goes beyond the beloved... The possibility of the Other appearing as an object of a need while retaining his alterity, or again,the possibility of enjoying the Other... this simultaneity of need and desire, or concupiscence and transcendence,... constitutes the originality of the erotic which, in this sense, is the equivocal par excellence.”
“To approach the Other in conversation is to welcome his expression, in which at each instant he overflows the idea a thought would carry away from it. It is therefore to receive from the Other beyond the capacity of the I, which means exactly: to have the idea of infinity. But this also means: to be taught. The relation with the Other, or Conversation, is a non-allergic relation, an ethical relation; but inasmuch as it is welcomed this conversation is a teaching. Teaching is not reducible to maieutics; it comes from the exterior and brings me more than I contain. In its non-violent transitivity the very epiphany of the face is produced.”
“This world, in which reason is more and more at home, is not habitable. It is hard and cold like those depots in which are piled up goods that cannot satisfy: neither clothe those who are naked, nor feed those who are hungry; it is as impersonal as factory hangars and industrial cities in which manufactured things remain abstract, true with statistical truth and borne on the anonymous circuit of the economy, resulting from skilful planning decisions which cannot prevent, but prepare disasters. There it is, the mind in its masculine essence, living on the outside, exposed to the violent, blinding sun, to the trade winds that beat against it and beat it down, on a land without folds, rootless, solitary and wandering and thus already alienated by the very things which it caused to be produced and which remain untameable and hostile.”
“the "small goodness" from one person to his fellowman is lost and deformed as soon as it seeks organization and universality and system, as soon as it opts for doctrine, a treatise of politics and theology, a party, a state, and even a church. Yet it remains the sole refuge of the good in being. Unbeaten, it undergoes the violence of evil, which, as small goodness, it can neither vanquish nor drive out. A little kindness going only from man to man, not crossing distances to get to the places where events and forces unfold! A remarkable utopia of the good or the secret of its beyond.”
“El amor no es una posibilidad, no se debe a nuestra iniciativa, es sin razón, nos invade y nos hiere y, sin embargo, el yo sobrevive en él. Una fenomenología de la voluptuosidad -la voluptuosidad no es un placer cualquiera, porque no es un placer solitario como el comer o el beber-, parece confirmar nuestro punto de vista sobre el papel y el lugar excepcionales representados por lo femenino, y sobre la ausencia de toda fusión en el erotismo.”