“To the Congress:Unhappy events abroad have retaught us two simple truths about the liberty of a democratic people.The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism—ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.The second truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if its business system does not provide employment and produce and distribute goods in such a way as to sustain an acceptable standard of living.Both lessons hit home.Among us today a concentration of private power without equal in history is growing.This concentration is seriously impairing the economic effectiveness of private enterprise as a way of providing employment for labor and capital and as a way of assuring a more equitable distribution of income and earnings among the people of the nation as a whole.”
Explore This Quote Further
-
Working on it...
Quote Analysis of Franklin D. Roosevelt's Address
Franklin D. Roosevelt's quote addresses the dangers posed to democracy by the concentration of private power and the economic system's ability to support the populace. His insights reflect a deep understanding of the relationship between government, private ownership, and the welfare of citizens.
Roosevelt begins by asserting that the liberty of a democratic state is jeopardized when private power is allowed to grow unchecked. He emphasizes that allowing private entities to overshadow the government can lead to a form of fascism, where control is effectively removed from the democratic processes and handed over to a select few. This assertion highlights a fundamental principle in Roosevelt's philosophy: a healthy democracy requires vigilance against the encroachment of concentrated power.
He further articulates that the economic system must serve the people, ensuring employment and the fair distribution of goods. Roosevelt recognizes that without a robust social safety net and fair economic practices, democracy cannot truly thrive. His call to action echoes a need for balance; the government must ensure that the economic systems in place promote not just profitability but also societal well-being.
Roosevelt's conclusion—warning that the concentration of private power is impairing economic effectiveness—serves as a precursor to the reforms he would advocate during his presidency. His recognition of the challenges presented by private power and inequality speaks to the ongoing struggles democracies face. His words resonate today, reminding us of the importance of fostering a political and economic environment that prioritizes the welfare of all citizens over the interests of a powerful few.
Modern Relevance of FDR's Insights on Democracy and Private Power
Franklin D. Roosevelt’s address to Congress highlights enduring truths about the relationship between democracy, private power, and economic stability. In our current socio-political landscape, his words resonate amidst growing concerns about economic inequality and the influence of powerful private entities on government policies.
Roosevelt's first truth emphasizes the danger of private power overshadowing democratic institutions. In today’s world, we witness significant lobbying efforts and political donations that can lead to policies favoring wealthy individuals or corporations over the broader public interest. This has raised alarms about the erosion of democratic integrity, as many voices call for reforms to ensure greater transparency and accountability in political financing.
The second truth addresses the fundamental need for an economic structure that ensures decent living standards for all citizens. With the rise of automation, gig economies, and corporate consolidation, many individuals find themselves struggling with stagnant wages and job insecurity. The increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of a few poses challenges to equitable economic distribution, echoing Roosevelt's warning that a thriving democracy depends on the wellbeing of its citizens.
As the issues of private power and economic disparity become ever more pressing, Roosevelt's insights serve as a crucial reminder of the need for vigilance and action to safeguard democracy and promote a fair economic system.
Understanding the Message of Franklin D. Roosevelt on Democracy and Private Power
Franklin D. Roosevelt’s address to Congress highlights the critical relationship between democracy and the influence of private power. His insightful remarks remind us of the essential truths that underpin a healthy democratic society. Here are some examples illustrating the themes he addressed:
1. Impact of Concentrated Private Power
Roosevelt warns against the concentration of power in private hands. For instance, in modern contexts, large technology companies can dominate the market and influence legislation, potentially undermining democratic processes and creating an imbalance that could lead to a form of oligarchy.
2. The Imperative of Economic Equity
The second truth concerns the necessity of a business system that supports a fair standard of living. An example is the rise of the gig economy, where many individuals are engaged in precarious work with little security or benefits. This situation reflects Roosevelt's concern about maintaining economic stability and equity within society.
3. Warnings Against Fascism
Roosevelt's warning about the potential for fascism is evident today. The increasing collaboration between big corporations and government entities can lead to a situation where private interests overshadow public welfare, reminiscent of fascist regimes where government is essentially owned by powerful individuals or groups.
4. The Role of Employment in Democracy
When discussing the need for businesses to provide adequate employment, consider the job market during economic downturns. High unemployment rates not only affect individuals but also weaken the fabric of democracy by diminishing civic engagement and participation.
5. Lessons from History
Roosevelt’s points are echoed in contemporary discussions about the need for regulation to ensure that no single entity can wield excessive power over the economy or government, highlighting the importance of checks and balances.
Roosevelt’s reflections serve as a timely reminder of the vigilance required to protect democratic values against the encroachment of private power.
Similar quotes
“The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism -- ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.... Among us today a concentration of private power without equal in history is growing.”
“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power.”
“All agree that, the first responsibility for the alleviation of poverty and distress and for the care of the victims of the depression rests upon the locality — its individuals, organizations and Government. It rests, first of all, perhaps, upon the private agencies of philanthropy, secondly, other social organizations, and last, but not least, the Church. Yet all agree that to leave to the locality the entire responsibility would result in placing the heaviest burden in most cases upon those who are the least able to bear it. In other words, the communities that have the most difficult problem, like Detroit, would be the communities that would have to bear the heaviest of the burdens. And so the State should step in to equalize the burden by providing for a large portion of the care of the victims of poverty and by providing assistance and guidance for local communities. Above and beyond that duty of the States the national Government has a responsibility.”
“From the end of the World War twenty-one years ago, this country, like many others, went through a phase of having large groups of people carried away by some emotion--some alluring, attractive, even speciously inspiring, public presentation of a nostrum, a cure-all. Many Americans lost their heads because several plausible fellows lost theirs in expounding schemes to end barbarity, to give weekly handouts to people, to give everybody a better job--or, more modestly, for example, to put a chicken or two in every pot--all by adoption of some new financial plan or some new social system. And all of them burst like bubbles.Some proponents of nostrums were honest and sincere, others--too many of them--were seekers of personal power; still others saw a chance to get rich on the dimes and quarters of the poorer people in our population. All of them, perhaps unconsciously, were capitalizing on the fact that the democratic form of Government works slowly. There always exists in a democratic society a large group which, quite naturally, champs at the bit over the slowness of democracy; and that is why it is right for us who believe in democracy to keep the democratic processes progressive--in other words, moving forward with the advances in civilization. That is why it is dangerous for democracy to stop moving forward because any period of stagnation increases the numbers of those who demand action and action now.”
“If the fires of freedom and civil liberties burn low in other lands they must be made brighter in our own. If in other lands the press and books and literature of all kinds are censored we must redouble our efforts here to keep them free. If in other lands the eternal truths of the past are threatened by intolerance we must provide a safe place for their perpetuation.”
“Let us be clear at the outset that the liberty of individuals to carry on their business should not be abrogated unless the larger interests of the many are concerned. It is the purpose of government to see that not only the legitimate interests of the few are protected but that the welfare and rights of the many are conserved. These are the principals which must be remembered in any consideration of this question. This, I take it, is sound government-not politics.”