“I agree that two times two makes four is an excellent thing; but if we are dispensing praise, then two times two makes five is sometimes a most charming little thing as well.”
This quote by Fyodor Dostoyevsky reflects on the tension between objective truth and the value of creativity or imagination. "Two times two makes four" represents an undeniable fact, something concrete and universally accepted. Dostoyevsky acknowledges the importance and clarity of such truths by calling it "an excellent thing."
However, he adds a twist by suggesting that "two times two makes five"—a falsehood mathematically—can still be "a most charming little thing." This implies that there can be beauty, charm, or value in ideas or beliefs that depart from strict reality. It points to the human capacity for imagination, storytelling, or alternative perspectives that enrich life beyond mere facts.
In a broader sense, the quote explores how truth in art, philosophy, or human experience is not always about factual accuracy but can embrace paradox, metaphor, or even error, all of which contribute to emotional and intellectual depth. Dostoyevsky invites readers to appreciate the multifaceted nature of understanding, where both cold facts and warm fictions have their place.
“Very well, I agree that two and two make four is an excellent thing; but...two and two make five is also a very fine thing too.”
“But twice-two-makes-four is for all that a most insupportable thing. Twice-two-makes-four is, in my humble opinion, nothing but a piece of impudence. Twice-two-makes-four is a farcical, dressed-up fellow who stands across your path with arms akimbo and spits at you.”
“But gentlemen, what sort of free choice will there be when it comes down to tables and arithmetic, when all that’s left is two times two makes four? Two times two makes four even without my will. Is that what you call free choice?"— Fyodor Dostoyevsky”
“Twice two makes four seems to me simply a piece of insolence. Twice two makes four is a pert coxcomb who stands with arms akimbo barring your path and spitting. I admit that twice two makes four is an excellent thing, but if we are to give everything its due, twice two makes five is sometimes a very charming thing too.”
“With the anthill, the respectable race of ants began and with the anthill they will probably end, which does the greatest credit to their perseverance and staidness. But man is a frivolous and incongruous creature, and perhaps, like the chessplayer, loves only the process of the game, not the end of it. And who knows (on cannot swear to it), perhaps the only goal on earth to which mankind is striving lies in this incessant process of attaining, or in other words, in life itself, and not particularly in the goal which of course must always be two times two makes four, that is a formula, and after all, two times two makes four is no longer life, gentlemen, but is the beginning of death. Anyway, man has always been somehow afraid of this two times two makes four, and I am afraid of it even now. Granted that man does nothing but seek that two times two makes four, that he sails the oceans, sacrifices his life in the quest, but to succeed, really to find it -- he is somehow afraid, I assure you. He feels that as soon as he has found it there will be nothing for him to look for.”
“but the most sumptuous thing in the room at that moment was naturally the sumptuously laid table, though, of course, even that was comparatively speaking: the table-cloth was clean, the silver was brightly polished; three kinds of wonderfully baked bread, two bottles of wine, two bottles of excellent monastery mead, and a large glass jug of monastery kvas, famous throughout the neighbourhood. There was no vodka at all. Rakitin related afterwards that this time it was a five-course dinner: fish soup of sterlets served with fish patties; then boiled fish excellently prepared in a special way; then salmon cutlets, ice cream and stewed fruits and, finally, a fruit jelly.”