“I do think that women could make politics irrelevant; by a kind of spontaneous cooperative action the like of which we have never seen; which is so far from people’s ideas of state structure or viable social structure that it seems to them like total anarchy — when what it really is, is very subtle forms of interrelation that do not follow some heirarchal pattern which is fundamentally patriarchal. The opposite to patriarchy is not matriarchy but fraternity, yet I think it’s women who are going to have to break this spiral of power and find the trick of cooperation.”
Germaine Greer's statement highlights the potential for women to redefine political engagement through cooperative action that challenges traditional power structures. In her view, the existing political landscape is predominantly hierarchical and patriarchal, limiting the possibilities for meaningful social change.
Greer begins by suggesting that women possess the ability to render politics "irrelevant" through spontaneous cooperation that transcends conventional frameworks. This notion posits that the current understanding of governance and social organization is inadequate, often viewed as chaotic or anarchic when, in fact, it represents nuanced forms of interaction.
The use of the term "total anarchy" is particularly significant. It captures the discomfort society feels toward non-hierarchical structures, which are often deemed unmanageable or unsustainable. Greer argues that what might appear as chaos is, in reality, a sophisticated web of collaboration that restructures social dynamics. This perspective challenges the entrenched belief that effective governance must always adhere to a top-down approach.
Furthermore, Greer distinguishes between patriarchy and matriarchy, suggesting that neither structure is the ultimate solution to social inequalities. Instead, she proposes "fraternity" as a more equitable alternative—implying that relationships based on mutual support and respect, rather than dominance, could pave the way for a more just society.
The call to action is clear: women have a unique role in dismantling existing power hierarchies. Greer urges women not only to challenge patriarchal structures but also to embrace innovative forms of cooperation that can alter the political landscape. This idea sets the stage for rethinking how communities can work together to create a more equitable society without adhering to traditional power dynamics.
In summary, Greer's quote is a thought-provoking challenge to the status quo, inviting reflection on the nature of power, the potential of female solidarity, and the importance of cooperative action in shaping a more inclusive social order.
“We still make love to organs and not people; that so far from realising that people are never more idiosyncratic, never more totally there when they make love, we re never more incommunicative, never more alone.”
“The most cursory examination of even the most progressive organs of information reveals a curious inability to recognize women as newsmakers, unless they are young or married to a head of state or naked or pregnant by some triumph of technology or perpetrators or victims of some hideous crime or any combiniation of the above. Women's issues are often disguised as people issues, unless they are relegated to the women's pages which amazingly still suvive. Senior figures are all male; even the few women who are deemed worthy of obituaries are shown in images from their youth, as if the last fourty years of their lives have been without achievement of any kind. If you analyse the by-lines in your morning paper, you will see that the senior editorial staff are all older men, supported by a rabble of junior females, the infinitely replacesable 'hackettes'.”
“Yet if a woman never lets herself go, how will she ever know how far she might have got? If she never takes off her high-heeled shoes, how will she ever know how far she could walk or how fast she could run?”
“I didn't fight to get women out from behind vacuum cleaners to get them onto the board of Hoover.”
“It is often falsely assumed, even by feminists, that sexuality is the enemy of the female who really wants to develop these aspects of her personality, and this is perhaps the most misleading aspect of movements like the National Organization of Women. It was not the insistence upon her sex that weakened the American woman student's desire to make something of her education, but the insistence upon a passive sexual role”
“Sadness is the matrix from which wit and irony spring; sadness is uncomfortable and creative, which is why consumer society cannot tolerate it.”