“To become imperceptible oneself, to have dismantled love in order to become capable of loving. To have dismantled one's self in order finally to be alone and meet the true double at the other end of the line. A clandestine passenger on a motionless voyage. To become like everybody else; but this, precisely, is a becoming only for one who knows how to be nobody, to no longer be anybody. To paint oneself gray on gray.”
In this quote by Gilles Deleuze, the idea of becoming imperceptible and dismantling oneself is explored. Deleuze suggests that in order to truly love and be capable of meeting one's true self, one must first strip away all external layers and become like everybody else. This process involves a deep introspection and a shedding of one's ego in order to ultimately be alone and find one's true essence. Deleuze uses the analogy of painting oneself gray on gray to convey the idea of blending in and becoming unnoticeable in order to truly discover one's identity. This quote emphasizes the importance of self-reflection and transformation in order to reach a state of true authenticity and understanding of oneself.
Gilles Deleuze's quote emphasizes the idea of breaking down societal constructs and expectations in order to find true self-identity and authenticity. In today's fast-paced world of social media and constant connectivity, it is easy to lose sight of who we truly are amidst the pressures of conforming to certain norms and standards. Deleuze's words remind us of the importance of dismantling the layers of artificiality that we may have built up around ourselves, in order to truly connect with our inner selves and find genuine connections with others. This quote encourages us to embrace our uniqueness and individuality, rather than conforming to society's expectations.
Gilles Deleuze's quote about becoming imperceptible and dismantling oneself to truly love and meet one's true double resonates deeply with those who seek introspection and self-discovery. It highlights the importance of self-awareness and the journey towards authenticity.
In contemplating Gilles Deleuze's quote about becoming imperceptible and dismantling oneself, it's important to reflect on the following questions:
“The self is only a threshold, a door, a becoming between two multiplicities”
“Philosophy, art, and science are not the mental objects of an objectified brain but the three aspects under which the brain becomes subject.”
“The historical fact is that cinema was constituted as such by becoming narrative, by presenting a story, and by rejecting its other possible directions. The approximation which follows is that, from that point, the sequences of images and even each image, a single shot, are assimilated to propositions or rather oral utterances [...].”
“State philosophy reposes on a double identity: of the thinking subject, and of the concepts it creates and to which it lends its own presumed attributes of sameness and constancy. The subjects, its concepts, and also the objects in the world to which the concepts are applied have a shared, internal essence: the self-resemblance at the basis of identity. Representational thought is analogical; its concern is to establish a correspondence between these symmetrically structured domains. The faculty of judgment is the policeman of analogy, assuring that each of these terms is honestly itself, and that the proper correspondences obtain. In thought its end is truth, in action justice. The weapons it wields in their pursuit are limitive distribution (the determination of the exclusive set of properties possessed by each term in contradistinction to the others: logos, law) and hierarchical ranking (the measurement of the degree of perfection of a term’s self-resemblance in relation to a supreme standard, man, god, or gold: value, morality). The modus operandi is negation: x = x = not y. Identity, resemblance, truth, justice, and negation. The rational foundation for order. The established order, of course: philosophers have traditionally been employees of the State. The collusion between philosophy and the State was most explicitly enacted in the first decade of the nineteenth century with the foundation of the University of Berlin, which was to become the model of higher learning throughout Europe and in the United States. The goal laid out for it by Wilhelm von Humboldt (based on proposals by Fichte and Schleiermacher) was the ‘spiritual and moral training of the nation,’ to be achieved by ‘deriving everything from an original principle’ (truth), by ‘relating everything to an ideal’ (justice), and by ‘unifying this principle and this ideal to a single Idea’ (the State). The end product would be ‘a fully legitimated subject of knowledge and society’ – each mind an analogously organized mini-State morally unified in the supermind of the State. More insidious than the well-known practical cooperation between university and government (the burgeoning military funding of research) is its philosophical role in the propagation of the form of representational thinking itself, that ‘properly spiritual absolute State’ endlessly reproduced and disseminated at every level of the social fabric.”
“What does belief applied to the unconscious signify? What is an unconscious that no longer does anything but believe, rather than produce? What are the operations, the artifices that inject the unconscious with ‘beliefs’ that are not even rational, but on the contrary only too reasonable and consistent with the established order?”
“To affirm is not to bear, carry, or harness oneself to that which exists, but on the contrary to unburden, unharness, and set free that which lives.”