“Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA -- ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State.”
Explore This Quote Further
Analysis of Quote by Heinrich Himmler
In this quote, Heinrich Himmler, a key figure in Nazi Germany, suggests that only members of the SS or SA should have access to firearms, as they serve the state. He implies that ordinary citizens do not need guns as their possession does not benefit the state.
This quote reflects the authoritarian and controlling nature of the Nazi regime, where personal freedoms and individual rights were suppressed in the name of serving the State. It also highlights the militarization of society under the Nazis, with certain groups being granted privileges and power over others. Overall, it reveals the extreme measures taken by the Nazi regime to consolidate power and suppress dissent.
Modern Relevance
Heinrich Himmler's quote emphasizing the centralization of firearms within the state serves as a cautionary tale against authoritarian control of weapons. In today's society, the debate over gun control and individual rights is ongoing, with advocates on both sides drawing parallels to historical events like the rise of the Nazi regime in Germany.
Heinrich Himmler's Quote on Firearms
One of the key figures behind the Holocaust, Heinrich Himmler, once famously stated, "Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA -- ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State." This quote underscores the Nazi regime's control over firearms and its emphasis on centralizing weaponry with state-sanctioned organizations.
Reflection Questions
Reflecting on this statement by Heinrich Himmler, consider the following questions:
- What are the potential dangers of restricting firearms access to only certain groups within society?
- How does the idea of the state determining who should or shouldn't have access to firearms impact individual freedoms and rights?
- In what ways can gun control measures be balanced with ensuring public safety and security?
- How does the historical context of Nazi Germany influence your understanding of this statement?
- What are the implications of allowing the state to have sole control over firearms in a society?
Similar quotes
“The best political weapon is the weapon of terror. Cruelty commands respect. Men may hate us. But, we don't ask for their love; only for their fear. ”
“My honor is my loyalty. ”
“Christianity - and that is its greatest merit - has somewhat mitigated that brutal Germanic love of war, but it could not destroy it. Should that subduing talisman, the cross, be shattered, the frenzied madness of the ancient warriors, that insane Berserk rage of which Nordic bards have spoken and sung so often, will once more burst into flame. This talisman is fragile, and the day will come when it will collapse miserably. Then the ancient stony gods will rise from the forgotten debris and rub the dust of a thousand years from their eyes, and finally Thor with his giant hammer will jump up and smash the Gothic cathedrals. ... Do not smile at the visionary who anticipates the same revolution in the realm of the visible as has taken place in the spiritual. Thought precedes action as lightning precedes thunder. German thunder is of true Germanic character; it is not very nimble, but rumbles along ponderously. Yet, it will come and when you hear a crashing such as never before has been heard in the world's history, then you know that the German thunderbolt has fallen at last. At that uproar the eagles of the air will drop dead, and lions in the remotest deserts of Africa will hide in their royal dens. A play will be performed in Germany which will make the French Revolution look like an innocent idyll. (1834)”
“We don't use guns because we don't have guns”
“We have a saying in Tibet: If a problem can be solved there is no use worrying about it. If it can't be solved, worrying will do no good.”
“I am no longer a divine biped. I am no longer the freest German after Goethe, as Ruge named me in healthier days. I am no longer the great hero No. 2, who was compared with the grape-crowned Dionysius, whilst my colleague No. 1 enjoyed the title of a Grand Ducal Weimarian Jupiter. I am no longer a joyous, somewhat corpulent Hellenist, laughing cheerfully down upon the melancholy Nazarenes. I am now a poor fatally-ill Jew, an emaciated picture of woe, an unhappy man.”