“Philosophy . . .consists chiefly in suggesting unintelligible answers to insoluble problems.”
Henry Adams’ quote, “Philosophy . . . consists chiefly in suggesting unintelligible answers to insoluble problems,” critiques the nature and impact of philosophical inquiry. In this analysis, we will explore the implications of this statement, its tone, and the broader context of philosophical thought.
Adams highlights a cynical view of philosophy, suggesting that it often fails to provide clear or practical solutions to fundamental questions. By characterizing philosophical answers as "unintelligible," he implies that many philosophical arguments may be convoluted or obscure, leaving individuals no closer to resolution than before. This perspective resonates with common frustrations regarding the abstract nature of philosophical discourse, where profound questions about existence, morality, and knowledge often yield more confusion than clarity.
Additionally, the phrase "insoluble problems" suggests a certain futility inherent in philosophical pursuits. Adams seems to imply that some questions—such as the meaning of life, the nature of truth, or the existence of free will—are beyond human comprehension and cannot be definitively answered. This notion of philosophical limits can provoke readers to question the value of philosophical inquiry itself and whether it is worth engaging in discussions that lead to more questions rather than answers.
The quote also reflects sentiments prevalent in the late 19th century, a time when many thinkers were grappling with the transformations brought about by industrialization and modernity. Against the backdrop of rapid social change, traditional philosophical paradigms were being challenged, leading to a crisis in meaning and understanding. Adams may be articulating a disillusionment with the capacity of philosophy to guide individuals in a complex and often unpredictable world.
In conclusion, Henry Adams’ quote reveals a critical stance toward the role of philosophy in addressing life's most profound challenges. It embodies a tension between the ambition to seek understanding and the potential emptiness of that pursuit, encouraging reflection on the limits of human reasoning and the complexities of existence.
“the problem of life was as simple as it was classic. Politics offered no difficulties, for there the moral law was a sure guide. Social perfection was also sure, because human nature worked for Good, and three instruments were all she asked — Suffrage, Common Schools, and Press. On these points doubt was forbidden. Education was divine, and man needed only a correct knowledge of facts to reach perfection: "Were half the power that fills the world with terror, Were half the wealth bestowed on camps and courts, Given to redeem the human mind from error, There were no need of arsenals nor forts.”
“From cradle to grave this problem of running order through chaos, direction through space, discipline through freedom, unity through multiplicity, has always been, and must always be, the task of education, as it is the moral of religion, philosophy, science, art, politics and economy; but a boy's will is his life, and he dies when it is broken, as the colt dies in harness, taking a new nature in becoming tame...”
“Charles Francis Adams was singular for mental poise — absence of self-assertion or self-consciousness — the faculty of standing apart without seeming aware that he was alone — a balance of mind and temper that neither challenged nor avoided notice, nor admitted question of superiority or inferiority, of jealousy, of personal motives, from any source, even under great pressure.”
“In practice, such trifles as contradictions in principle are easily set aside; the faculty of ignoring them makes the practical man.”
“The habit of looking at life as a social relation — an affair of society — did no good. It cultivated a weakness which needed no cultivation. If it had helped to make men of the world, or give the manners and instincts of any profession — such as temper, patience, courtesy, or a faculty of profiting by the social defects of opponents — it would have been education better worth having than mathematics or languages; but so far as it helped to make anything, it helped only to make the college standard permanent through life.”
“The habit of expression leads to the search for something to express. Something remains as a residuum of the commonplace itself, if one strikes out every commonplace in the expression.”