“But there is no perfect guide for discerning God's movement in the world, Contrary to what many conservatives say, the Bible is not a blueprint on this matter. It is a valuable symbol for point to God's revelation in Jesus, but it is not self-interpreting. We are thus place in an existential situation of freedom in which the burden is on us to make decisions without a guaranteed ethical guide.”
Explore This Quote Further
Quote Analysis
In this quote by James H. Cone, he challenges the idea that the Bible serves as a perfect guide for discerning God's movement in the world. Instead, Cone argues that the Bible is a valuable symbol that points to God's revelation in Jesus, but it is not a definitive blueprint for ethical decision-making. Cone asserts that individuals are ultimately responsible for making ethical decisions without a guaranteed guide.
Cone's statement underscores the idea that individuals must grapple with the complexities of ethical decision-making on their own, without relying solely on external sources like the Bible. This perspective emphasizes personal agency and the inherent freedom and responsibility that come with making moral choices. It suggests that ethical decision-making is a dynamic process that involves critical thought, self-reflection, and engagement with one's values and beliefs. Ultimately, Cone's words encourage individuals to take ownership of their ethical decisions and to embrace the uncertainty and responsibility that comes with this process.
The Challenge of Discerning God's Movement
James H. Cone's assertion that there is no perfect guide for discerning God's movement in the world raises questions about the role of scripture, particularly the Bible, in ethical decision-making. This challenges the idea that the Bible provides a clear blueprint for moral guidance, placing the responsibility on individuals to navigate their own ethical choices. Cone emphasizes the need for a nuanced understanding of scripture as a symbol pointing towards God's revelation in Jesus, rather than a definitive rulebook for all situations. This existential stance of freedom highlights the complexity of ethical decision-making and calls for a deeper engagement with the human experience of discernment.
Reflection on God's Movement and Ethics
James H. Cone argues that there is no perfect guide for discerning God's movement in the world, and that the burden of ethical decision-making falls on individuals. He challenges the notion that the Bible serves as a blueprint for ethical decision-making, emphasizing the need for individuals to interpret and apply its teachings in their own unique contexts.
Reflection Questions:
In this quote by James H. Cone, he challenges the idea that the Bible serves as a perfect guide for discerning God's movement in the world. Instead, he highlights the importance of our own freedom and responsibility in making ethical decisions. To further reflect on this concept, consider the following questions:
- How do you interpret the role of the Bible in guiding ethical decision-making?
- What experiences have shaped your understanding of God's movement in the world?
- How do you navigate the tension between freedom and the need for ethical guidance in decision-making?
- In what ways do you seek to discern God's will in your own life and in the world around you?
- How do you handle the uncertainty and ambiguity that comes with making ethical decisions without a guaranteed guide?
Similar quotes
“The Christian community, therefore, is that community that freely becomes oppressed, because they know that Jesus himself has defined humanity's liberation in the context of what happens to the little ones. Christians join the cause of the oppressed in the fight for justice not because of some philosophical principle of "the Good" or because of a religious feeling of sympathy for people in prison. Sympathy does not change the structures of injustice. The authentic identity of Christians with the poor is found in the claim which the Jesus-encounter lays upon their own life-style, a claim that connects the word "Christian" with the liberation of the poor. Christians fight not for humanity in general but for themselves and out of their love for concrete human beings.”
“Indeed our survival and liberation depend upon our recognition of the truth when it is spoken and lived by the people. If we cannot recognize the truth, then it cannot liberate us from untruth. To know the truth is to appropriate it, for it is not mainly reflection and theory. Truth is divine action entering our lives and creating the human action of liberation.”
“It is ironic that America, with its history of injustice to the poor, especially the black man and the Indian, prides itself on being a Christian nation.”
“How can a world be good in which Money is the moving power, and Self-interest the guiding star?”
“[The Bible] has to be interpreted. And if it isn’t interpreted, then it can’t be put into action. So if we are serious about following God, then we have to interpret the Bible. It is not possible to simply do what the Bible says. We must first make decisions about what it means at this time, in this place, for these people.”
“In contrast to the institutions of the world, which teach us to KNOW something, the gospel of Jesus Christ challenges us to BECOME something...The gospel of Jesus Christ is the plan by which we can become what children of god are supposed to become...Charity is something one becomes. ”