“Rhino-mounted Bantu shock troops could have overthrown the Roman Empire. It never happened.”
In this quote by Jared Diamond, the idea of the potential power of Bantu shock troops mounted on rhinos is presented in a hypothetical scenario. By stating that such a force could have overthrown the Roman Empire, Diamond is highlighting the importance of factors such as military tactics and resources in shaping historical outcomes. This quote underscores the idea that historical events are often contingent upon a variety of factors and opportunities that may or may not have been realized. Diamond's use of imagination serves to demonstrate the complexity of historical processes and the potential for different outcomes based on alternative circumstances.
In this quote by Jared Diamond, the idea of what could have been in history is explored. While the notion of rhino-mounted troops overthrowing the Roman Empire may seem far-fetched, it is an interesting concept to consider in terms of power dynamics and missed opportunities. Today, this quote serves as a reminder of the potential outcomes of historical events and the impact they can have on the course of civilization.
"Rhino-mounted Bantu shock troops could have overthrown the Roman Empire. It never happened.” - Jared Diamond"
Reflect on the concept presented by Jared Diamond that rhino-mounted Bantu shock troops could have potentially overthrown the Roman Empire. What factors do you think may have contributed to this not happening? How important do you think military strategy and technology were in the rise and fall of ancient empires? Could different outcomes have occurred if certain events in history had played out differently? How does this concept challenge traditional views of historical power dynamics and conquests? What other historical scenarios can you think of where small changes could have had significant impacts on the course of history?
“To me, the conclusion that the public has the ultimate responsibility for the behavior of even the biggest businesses is empowering and hopeful, rather than disappointing. My conclusion is not a moralistic one about who is right or wrong, admirable or selfish, a good guy or a bad guy. My conclusion is instead a prediction, based on what I have seen happening in the past. Businesses have changed when the public came to expect and require different behavior, to reward businesses for behavior that the public wanted, and to make things difficult for businesses practicing behaviors that the public didn't want. I predict that in the future, just as in the past, changes in public attitudes will be essential for changes in businesses' environmental practices.”
“The metaphor is so obvious. Easter Island isolated in the Pacific Ocean — once the island got into trouble, there was no way they could get free. There was no other people from whom they could get help. In the same way that we on Planet Earth, if we ruin our own [world], we won't be able to get help.”
“Much of human history has consisted of unequal conflicts between the haves and the have-nots.”
“Why you white man have so much cargo and we New Guineans have so little? (asked Yali)”
“When you have seen the errors in which you live, you will understand the good that we have done you by coming to your land by order of his Majesty the King of Spain. Our Lord permitted that your pride should be brought low and that no Indian should be able to offend a Christian.”
“In contrast [to trees and fish], oil, metals, and coal are not renewable; they don't reproduce, sprout, or have sex to produce baby oil droplets or coal nuggets.”