“The first symptom of the trouble appeared when Madison studied Hamilton’s proposal for the funding of the domestic debt. On the one hand, Hamilton’s recommendation looked straightforward: All citizens who owned government securities should be reimbursed at par—that is, the full value of the government’s original promise. But many original holders of the securities, mainly veterans of the American Revolution who had received them as pay for their service in the war, had then sold them at a fraction of their original value to speculators. What’s more, the release of Hamilton’s plan produced...”
Analysis of Quote by Joseph J. Ellis
In this quote by Joseph J. Ellis, he discusses the conflict between James Madison and Alexander Hamilton over the funding of the domestic debt. Hamilton's proposal to reimburse all citizens who owned government securities at their original value created tension as many original holders had sold them at a fraction of their value to speculators. This situation highlights the complexities and conflicts that arose in early American politics, as different perspectives and interests clashed over economic policies.
Modern Relevance:
In Joseph J. Ellis's analysis of the early American government's struggles with debt and financial policy, we can draw parallels to modern debates surrounding economic justice and wealth inequality. Hamilton's proposal to reimburse government securities at par value, despite the speculators having purchased them at a fraction of their original worth, raises questions about fairness and the role of government in regulating financial markets. Today, issues of wealth consolidation and the impact of economic policies on different socio-economic groups continue to be significant topics of discussion.
Analysis of Hamilton's Proposal by Madison
"The first symptom of the trouble appeared when Madison studied Hamilton’s proposal for the funding of the domestic debt. On the one hand, Hamilton’s recommendation looked straightforward: All citizens who owned government securities should be reimbursed at par—that is, the full value of the government’s original promise. But many original holders of the securities, mainly veterans of the American Revolution who had received them as pay for their service in the war, had then sold them at a fraction of their original value to speculators. What’s more, the release of Hamilton’s plan produced..." - Joseph J. Ellis
Reflection Questions:
As we consider the situation between Madison and Hamilton regarding the funding of the domestic debt, it raises some important questions for reflection:
How should a government balance the interests of original holders of securities with those of speculators who purchased them at a discounted rate?
What ethical considerations come into play when deciding how to reimburse individuals for their government securities?
In what ways do economic policies, such as Hamilton's funding proposal, impact different segments of society, such as veterans of the American Revolution and speculators?
How can conflicts such as this one between Madison and Hamilton be resolved in a way that is fair and just for all parties involved?
Similar quotes
“It should be “with great earnestness” (D&C 123:14) that we bring the light of the gospel to those who are searching for answers the plan of salvation has to offer. Many are concerned for their families. Some are looking for security in a world of changing values. Our opportunity is to give them hope and courage and to invite them to come with us and join those who embrace the gospel of Jesus Christ. The Lord’s gospel is on earth and will bless their lives here and in the eternities to come”
“Those who say there are no more original ideas need to get out of the way of those of us who are creating them.”
“How good something is should never be determined by its cost, designer, origin, or its perceived value by others.”
“The original American patriots were those individuals brave enough to resist with force the oppressive power of King George...Patriotism is more closely linked to dissent than it is to conformity and a blind desire for safety and security.”
“Our first experience of life is primarily felt in the *body.* ... We know ourselves in the security of those who hold us and gaze upon us. It's not heard or seen or thought it's felt. That's the original knowing.”