“He's lost something, some illusion I used to think was necessary to him. He's come to realize he too is human. Or is this a performance, for my benefit, to show me he's up-to-date? Maybe men shouldn't have been told about their own humanity. It's only made them uncomfortable. It's only made them trickier, slier, more evasive, harder to read.”
In this quote by Margaret Atwood, she reflects on the idea of male vulnerability and the impact of men coming to terms with their own humanity. Atwood questions whether this newfound awareness is genuine or merely a performance put on to impress others. She suggests that revealing their humanity has made men more complex and difficult to understand, leading to a sense of discomfort and evasion. Atwood's words highlight the complexities of human nature and the challenges that come with confronting one's own vulnerabilities.
In this quote by Margaret Atwood, she touches upon the idea of men coming to terms with their own humanity and how it has affected their behavior. In today's society, the concept of masculinity is constantly being redefined and challenged. Men are now encouraged to embrace their vulnerability and express their emotions, rather than conforming to traditional stereotypes of stoicism and toughness. This shift has led to a greater understanding and acceptance of men's complexities and has paved the way for more authentic and transparent relationships. Atwood's words resonate with the ongoing discourse surrounding masculinity and the importance of self-realization in shaping one's identity.
In this quote, Margaret Atwood reflects on the impact of men acknowledging their own humanity. She questions whether this awareness has made them defensive and harder to understand. The use of introspection and questioning adds depth to her observation.
Margaret Atwood's quote raises important questions about the nature of human identity and behavior. As you ponder on this quote, consider the following reflection questions:
“A friend of mine told a story about a date with a guy she was really excited about: He stood her up. He then called her, begging her forgiveness and giving some excuse. She told him to get lost, telling him that he only gets one shot with her, and he blew it.”
“The revolution had come too late for him. He was in his midforties when the Civil Rights Act was signed and close to fifty when its effects were truly felt.He did not begrudge the younger generation their opportunities. He only wished that more of them, his own children, in particular, recognized their good fortune, the price that had been paid for it, and made the most of it. He was proud to have lived to see the change take place.He wasn't judging anyone and accepted the fact that history had come too late for him to make much use of all the things that were now opening up. But he couldn't understand why some of the young people couldn't see it. Maybe you had to live through the worst of times to recognize the best of times when they came to you. Maybe that was just the way it was with people.”
“It's God that's worrying me. That's the only thing that's worrying me. What if He doesn't exist? What if Rakitin's right -that it's an idea made up by men? Then, if He doesn't exist, man is the king of the earth, of the universe. Magnificent! Only how is he going to be good without God? That's the question. I always come back to that. Who is man going to love then? To whom will he be thankful? To whom will he sing the hymn? Rakitin laughs. Rakitin says that one can love humanity instead of God. Well, only an idiot can maintain that. I can't understand it. Life's easy for Rakitin. 'You'd better think about the extension of civic rights, or of keeping down the price of meat. You will show your love for humanity more simply and directly by that, than by philosophy.' I answered him: 'Well, but you, without a God, are more likely to raise the price of meat if it suits you, and make a rouble on every penny.' He lost his temper. But after all, what is goodness? Answer that, Alyosha. Goodness is one thing with me and another with a Chinaman, so it's relative. Or isn't it? Is it not relative? A treacherous question! You won't laugh if I tell you it's kept me awake for two nights. I only wonder now how people can live and think nothing about it. Vanity!”
“He's not a bad guy, John. It's human nature. He wanted it to be some mistake I made that he wouldn't have made, some flaw in me that he didn't share, so he could believe it wouldn't have happened to him. But it wasn't my fault. It was either blind, dumb, stupid luck from start to finish, in which case, we are all in the wrong business gentleman, or it was a God I cannot worship.”
“Not long after the book came out I found myself being driven to a meetingby a professor of electrical engineering in the graduate school I of MIT. He said that after reading the book he realized that his graduate students were using on him, and had used for the ten years and more he had been teaching there, all the evasive strategies I described in the book — mumble, guess-and-look, take a wild guess and see what happens, get the teacher to answer his own questions, etc.But as I later realized, these are the games that all humans play when othersare sitting in judgment on them.”