“A critique does not consist in saying that things aren't good the way they are. It consists in seeing on just what type of assumptions, of familiar notions, of established and unexamined ways of thinking the accepted practices are based... To do criticism is to make harder those acts which are now too easy.”
Critique as Uncovering Assumptions
"A critique does not consist in saying that things aren't good the way they are. It consists in seeing on just what type of assumptions, of familiar notions, of established and unexamined ways of thinking the accepted practices are based... To do criticism is to make harder those acts which are now too easy." - Michel Foucault
Quote Analysis
In this quote, Michel Foucault emphasizes the importance of critique not simply as a means of pointing out flaws or inadequacies, but as a way of uncovering and questioning the underlying assumptions and beliefs that shape accepted practices. Rather than dismissing things as "not good," critiquing involves examining the foundations on which these practices are built. By challenging the status quo and delving into the core beliefs that support it, criticism forces us to confront the ease with which we accept certain ideas and behaviors without questioning their validity. This quote highlights the disruptive and transformative power of critical thinking and analysis.
The Importance of Critique in Challenging Established Practices
Michel Foucault's words remind us of the necessity of critical thinking in analyzing and questioning the underlying assumptions of accepted practices. In today's constantly evolving society, it is crucial to not simply accept things as they are, but to actively engage in critique to challenge and improve existing systems and beliefs. By questioning the status quo and examining the foundations of our actions, we can strive to make informed and meaningful changes that push us towards progress and societal betterment.
Reflection Questions:
As Michel Foucault suggests, criticism involves looking beyond the surface and questioning the underlying assumptions and beliefs that inform our accepted practices. It challenges us to reexamine our ways of thinking and to make the familiar more difficult by bringing it into question. Consider the following reflection questions to deepen your understanding of the assumptions that underlie your beliefs and actions:
- What are the assumptions and familiar notions that inform the practices or beliefs being criticized?
- How do these assumptions shape our understanding of the world and influence our actions?
- In what ways do these established ways of thinking make certain actions or practices easier or more acceptable?
- How might questioning these assumptions lead to a deeper understanding of the issues at hand and potentially open up new possibilities for change?
- What steps can be taken to challenge these established ways of thinking and make criticism a constructive force for positive change?
Similar quotes
“Holiness does not consist in doing extraordinary things. It consists in accepting, with a smile, what Jesus sends us. It consists in accepting and following the will of God.”
“Talent (a natural way of thinking, feeling, or behaving) × Investment (time spent practicing, developing your skills, and building your knowledge base) = Strength (the ability to consistently provide near-perfect performance)”
“Established religion is like established anything else. It's easy. It offers answers you can get prepackaged and predigested, right off the shelf, and the same for everybody. No thinking required, much less hard thinking. Like a board game--you follow the rules, you go to heaven. That's why established religion gets the assholes. They aren't "good" Christians. I rather doubt they ever gave up a thing they valued for any reason or anybody. People like that aren't good anything. What they believe, they believe because it's appropriate; it's what everybody believes because it's the right thing to do--in short, it's easy. Our way isn't easy. We get assholes too, but they usually give up and get out, or get it knocked out of them.”
“When you are criticizing the philosophy of an epoch, do not chiefly direct your attention to those intellectual positions which its exponents feel it necessary explicitly to defend. There will be some fundamental assumptions which adherents to all the variant systems within the epoch unconsciously presuppose. Such assumptions appear so obvious that people do not know what they are assuming because no other way of putting things has ever occurred to them. With these assumptions a certain limited number of types of philosophic systems are possible, and this group of systems constitutes the philosophy of the epoch.”
“You cannot consistently perform in a manner which is inconsistent with the way you see yourself.”