“I'm no prophet. My job is making windows where there were once walls.”
Explore This Quote Further
Michel Foucault on Breaking Barriers
“I'm no prophet. My job is making windows where there were once walls.” - Michel Foucault
Quote Analysis
Michel Foucault, a French philosopher and social theorist, is known for his influential work in challenging traditional structures of power and knowledge. In this quote, Foucault emphasizes his role as a thinker who seeks to break down barriers and create new perspectives.
By stating that he is not a prophet, Foucault distances himself from the idea of predicting the future. Instead, he sees his purpose as expanding possibilities and allowing fresh insights to emerge. The metaphor of making windows where walls once stood suggests a transformative process of breaking down limitations and opening up new ways of seeing and understanding the world. Through his work, Foucault aims to challenge established norms and create space for critical thought and exploration.
Embracing Change Through Breaking Barriers
In a world that is constantly evolving, Michel Foucault's quote about breaking down walls and creating windows holds significant modern relevance. In a society that often seeks to build barriers and limits, Foucault's words remind us that our role is not to predict the future, but to challenge existing boundaries and open up new possibilities. This mindset can be applied to various aspects of life, from social justice movements to technological advancements, reminding us to embrace change and push the boundaries of what is possible.
Reflection Questions:
Reflecting on this quote by Michel Foucault, consider these questions:
- In what ways have you experienced breaking down barriers or walls in your own life?
- How can you create opportunities for growth and change by "making windows" instead of building walls?
- What are some examples of when you have opened up new perspectives or possibilities for yourself or others?
Similar quotes
“I'm not making a problem out of a personal question; I make of a personal question an absence of a problem.”
“Where there is power, there is resistance.”
“Are you going to change yet again, shift your position according to the questions that are put to you, and say that the objections are not really directed at the place from which you are speaking? Are you going to declare yet again that you have never been what you have been reproached with being? Are you already preparing the way out that will enable you in your next book to spring up somewhere else and declare as you're now doing: no, no, I'm not where you are lying in wait for me, but over here, laughing at you?' 'What, do you imagine that I would take so much trouble and so much pleasure in writing, do you think that I would keep so persistently to my task, if I were not preparing – with a rather shaky hand – a labyrinth into which I can venture, into which I can move my discourse... in which I can lose myself and appear at last to eyes that I will never have to meet again. I am no doubt not the only one who writes in order to have no face. Do not ask who I am and do not ask me to remain the same: leave it to our bureaucrats and our police to see that our papers are in order. At least spare us their morality when we write.”
“I don’t feel that it is necessary to know exactly what I am. The main interest in life and work is to become someone else that you were not in the beginning. If you knew when you began a book what you would say at the end, do you think that you would have the courage to write it?What is true for writing and for love relationships is true also for life. The game is worthwhile insofar as we don’t know where it will end.”
“[T]hus one should not think that desire is repressed, for the simple reason that the law is what constitutes both desire and the lack on which it is predicated. Where there is desire, the power relation is already present: an illusion, then, to denounce this relation for a repression exerted after the event.”
“Once leprosy had gone, and the figure of the leper was no more than a distant memory, these structures still remained. The game of exclusion would be played again, often in these same places, in an oddly similar fashion two or three centuries later. The role of the leper was to be played by the poor and by the vagrant, by prisoners and by the 'alienated', and the sort of salvation at stake for both parties in this game of exclusion is the matter of this study.”