“For existential mathematics, which does not exist, would probably propose this equation: the value of coincidence equals the degree of its improbability.”
In this quote, Milan Kundera delves into the idea of existential mathematics and the concept of coincidence. The equation proposed by Kundera suggests that the value of a coincidence is directly proportional to its improbability. This can be interpreted as highlighting the significance and impact of unlikely events in our lives. It raises questions about the nature of chance and the way in which seemingly random occurrences can hold meaning and significance. Overall, the quote prompts reflection on the role of coincidence and improbability in shaping our understanding of reality.
In his quote, Milan Kundera delves into the concept of existential mathematics, a philosophical approach that challenges traditional mathematical principles. He suggests that the value of coincidence can be equated to its improbability, hinting at the unpredictable nature of life and the significance of chance occurrences.
This idea holds modern relevance in a world where randomness and serendipity often play a crucial role in shaping our lives and decisions. By considering the equation proposed by Kundera, we can reflect on the mysterious interconnectedness of events and the ways in which unlikely occurrences can hold profound meaning.
"For existential mathematics, which does not exist, would probably propose this equation: the value of coincidence equals the degree of its improbability."
In light of Milan Kundera's quote on existential mathematics and the value of coincidence, consider the following reflection questions:
“(existential mathematics...) the degree of slowness is directly proportional to the intensity of memory; the degree of speed is directly proportional to the intensity of forgetting.” –p. 39”
“When I described Madame de T's night, I recalled the well-known equation from one of the first chapters of the textbook of existential mathematics: the degree of speed is directly proportional to the intensity of forgetting. From that equation we can deduce various corrollaries, for instance this one: our period is given over to the demon of speed, and that is the reason it so easily forgets its own self. Now I would reverse that statement and say: our period is obsessed by the desire to forget, and it is to fulfill that desire that it gives over to the demon of speed; it picks up the pace to show us that it no longer wishes to be remembered; that it is tired of itself; sick of itself; that it wants to blow out the tiny trembling flame of memory.”
“There is a secret bond between slowness and memory, between speed and forgetting.A man is walking down the street. At a certain moment, he tries to recall something, but the recollection escapes him. Automatically, he slows down.Meanwhile, a person who wants to forget a disagreeable incident he has just lived through starts unconsciously to speed up his pace, as if he were trying to distance himself from a thing still too close to him in time.In existential mathematics that experience takes the form of two basic equations: The degree of slowness is directly proportional to the intensity of memory; the degree of speed is directly proportional to the intensity of forgetting.”
“Bacon's portraits are an interrogation on the limits of the self. Up to what degree of distortion does an individual still remain himself? To what degree of distortion does a beloved person still remain a beloved person? For how long does a cherished face growing remote through illness, through madness, through hatred, through death still remain recognizable? Where is the border beyond which a self ceases to be a self?”
“It does take great maturity to understand that the opinion we are arguing for is merely the hypothesis we favor, necessarily imperfect, probably transitory, which only very limited minds can declare to be a certainty or a truth.”
“Perhaps I love you. Perhaps I love you very much. But probably just for this reason it would be better if we remain as we are. I think a man and a woman love each other all the more when they don't live together and when they know about each other only that they exist, and when they are grateful to each other for the fact that they exist and that they know they exist. And that alone is enough for their happiness.”