“The term physical is just kinda like an honorific word, kinda like the word 'real' when we say 'the real truth'. It doesn't add anything, it just says 'this is serious truth'. So to say that something is 'physical' today just means 'you gotta take this seriously'.”
Explore This Quote Further
Quote Analysis: Noam Chomsky on the term "physical"
In this quote, Noam Chomsky challenges the significance of the term "physical" and suggests that it is used as a way to emphasize the seriousness or importance of something. According to Chomsky, when we describe something as "physical," we are essentially saying that it should be taken seriously. This perspective highlights the subjectivity and context-dependent nature of language, as different words may carry different implications or connotations based on societal norms and cultural understanding.
The Importance of Taking Physical Reality Seriously Today
In this quote, Noam Chomsky highlights the power of the term "physical" as a way to signify seriousness and authenticity. This idea is especially relevant in today's world, where trust and credibility are constantly being questioned. The use of the word "physical" serves as a reminder to not dismiss certain truths or realities lightly, emphasizing the need to approach them with sincerity and respect.
Noam Chomsky on the Term "Physical"
In a thought-provoking quote, Noam Chomsky explains how the term "physical" can often be used as an honorific word to signify the seriousness or importance of something. He compares it to the word "real" in phrases like "the real truth," indicating that calling something physical is a way of emphasizing its significance.
Reflection Questions:
In this quote, Noam Chomsky challenges our understanding of the term "physical" as simply a descriptor for something that is serious or should be taken seriously. Consider the following questions in reflecting on this idea:
- How does our perception of something change when we label it as "physical" versus something else?
- Do you agree with Chomsky that using the term "physical" adds a sense of seriousness or importance to a concept or idea?
- How might our societal understanding of the physical world impact our behavior and decision-making?
- Can you think of any examples where labeling something as "physical" has influenced how it is perceived or valued in our society?
- In what ways can we challenge traditional notions of what is considered "physical" or "real" in our everyday lives?
Feel free to ponder these questions and explore the implications of Chomsky's perspective on the term "physical" in our society.
Similar quotes
“Either you repeat the same conventional doctrines that everybody else is saying,... [o]r else you say something which in fact is true, and it will sound like it's from Neptune.”
“The two main criminals are France and the United States. They owe Haiti enormous reparations because of actions going back hundreds of years. If we could ever get to the stage where somebody could say, 'We're sorry we did it,' that would be nice. But if that just assuages guilt, it's just another crime. To become minimally civilized, we would have to say, 'We carried out and benefited from vicious crimes. A large part of the wealth of France comes from the crimes we committed against Haiti, and the United States gained as well. Therefore we are going to pay reparations to the Haitian people.' Then you will see the beginnings of civilization.”
“In fact, the belief that neurophysiology is even relevant to the functioning of the mind is just hypothesis. Who knows if we're looking at the right aspects of the brain at all. Maybe there are other aspects of the brain that nobody has even dreamt of looking at yet. That's often happened in the history of science. When people say that the mental is the neurophysiological at a higher level, they're being radically unscientific. We know a lot about the mental from a scientific point of view. We have explanatory theories that account for a lot of things. The belief that neurophysiology is implicated in these things could be true, but we have every little evidence for it. So, it's just a kind of hope; look around and you see neurons; maybe they're implicated.”
“[Ron Paul's politics] is just savagery, and it goes across the board; in fact, this holds for the whole libertarian ideology. I mean, it may sound nice on the surface, but when you think it through, it's just a call for corporate tyranny; takes away any barrier to corporate tyranny. Its a step towards the worst... but its all academic 'cause the business world would never permit it to happen, since it would destroy the economy. I mean, they can't live without a powerful 'nanny-state'. They know it.”
“I am not too happy with terms like “the left”, to be honest. And I don’t use it much….if by “the left” you mean people who are committed to peace and justice and freedom and so on, there can’t be elements of the left opposed to workers’ movement, at least under that definition.”
“That's the whole point of good propaganda. You want to create a slogan that nobody's going to be against, and everybody's going to be for. Nobody knows what it means, because it doesn't mean anything.”