“Science Fiction has rivets, fantasy has trees.”
Explore This Quote Further
Quote Analysis
In this quote by Orson Scott Card, he distinguishes between science fiction and fantasy by using the imagery of "rivets" for science fiction and "trees" for fantasy. This analogy suggests that science fiction is more focused on the technological and mechanical aspects, while fantasy tends to be more rooted in natural elements and magical themes. It highlights the idea that science fiction often deals with advanced technologies and futuristic concepts, while fantasy tends to explore more mystical and fantastical elements of storytelling. Overall, this quote captures the essence of the two genres and emphasizes their unique characteristics.
Exploring the Distinction Between Science Fiction and Fantasy
Orson Scott Card's comparison between science fiction and fantasy is a powerful way to highlight the differences between the two genres. In this quote, Card emphasizes the technological and industrial aspects of science fiction by mentioning rivets, while contrasting it with the more natural and magical elements of fantasy represented by trees. This distinction reflects the unique themes and settings that each genre explores, making it relevant in understanding how these genres continue to shape modern storytelling.
Orson Scott Card on Science Fiction vs. Fantasy
Orson Scott Card famously stated, "Science Fiction has rivets, fantasy has trees." This quote succinctly captures the main difference between the two genres - science fiction focuses on technology, often with a basis in scientific principles, while fantasy tends to incorporate magical or mystical elements such as trees. This distinction helps readers understand the unique appeal of each genre and choose books that align with their preferences.
Reflection Questions:
When thinking about the distinction between science fiction and fantasy as described by Orson Scott Card, consider the following questions:
- How are themes of technology, progress, and innovation typically explored in science fiction compared to fantasy?
- In what ways do science fiction stories focus on the impact of scientific advancements on society and humanity, while fantasy stories often delve into magical and mythical elements?
- How do the settings and worlds created in science fiction and fantasy differ in terms of believability and realism?
- Do you have a preference for either genre, and if so, why do you think that is?
- How do the themes and motifs in science fiction and fantasy reflect our own fears, dreams, and desires as humans?
Similar quotes
“As often I have been a science fiction writer writing science fiction for the community of science fiction readers, I am also, for good or ill, an American writing American literature to an American audience. Most fundamentally, though, I am a human being writing human literature to a human audience.”
“Fiction, because it is not about somebody who actually lived in the real world, always has the possibility of being about oneself.”
“Perhaps every writer who thoroughly creates a fictional world will inevitably create a mirror of his own time and yet also create a world that no one else but him has ever visited...”
“All the stories are fictions. What matters is which fiction you believe.”
“Do you think we're making a mistake?" snapped the Bishop."Not at all," said Dom Cristao. "I think we've taken a step toward something truly magnificent. But humankind almost never forgives true greatness.""Fortunately," said the Bishop, "humankind isn't the judge that matters. And now I intend to pray for this boy, since medical science has obviously reached the boundary of its competence.”
“I think that most of us, anyway, read these stories that we know are not "true" because we're hungry for another kind of truth: the mythic truth about human nature in general, the particular truth about those life-communities that define our own identity, and the most specific truth of all: our own self-story. Fiction, because it is not about someone who lived in the real world, always has the possibility of being about oneself. --From the Introduction”