“Political tags — such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth — are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire. The former are idealists acting from highest motives for the greatest good of the greatest number. The latter are surly curmudgeons, suspicious and lacking in altruism. But they are more comfortable neighbors than the other sort.”
Explore This Quote Further
Analysis
In this quote by Robert A. Heinlein, the author challenges the traditional political labels and instead divides humanity into two groups based on their desire for control over others. Heinlein suggests that political ideology is not the fundamental criterion for categorizing individuals, but rather their inclination towards controlling others. He portrays one group as idealistic individuals who believe in controlling people for the greater good, while the other group is depicted as suspicious and selfish individuals who have no desire to control others. Heinlein ultimately suggests that those who do not seek to control others may be more suitable neighbors, despite societal perceptions. This quote encourages readers to evaluate individuals based on their attitudes towards control rather than their political affiliations.
The Fluidity of Political Tags
In this quote by Robert A. Heinlein, the author challenges the conventional notion of political labels defining individuals. He posits that the true division lies in whether someone desires to control others or not. This concept remains relevant in modern society, where political labels are often used to categorize individuals, sometimes oversimplifying their beliefs and values. Heinlein's words remind us to look beyond these labels and consider the underlying motivations of individuals in our political landscape.
Quote Analysis
In this quote by Robert A. Heinlein, the author discusses different political ideologies and categorizes people into two groups based on their desires for control over others. Heinlein suggests that political labels such as royalist, communist, democrat, and fascist are not fundamental criteria, but rather, the division lies between those who seek to control others and those who do not.
Reflection Questions
Reflecting on this quote by Robert A. Heinlein, consider the following questions:
Do you agree with the idea that political divisions can be simplified into those who want to control others and those who do not? Why or why not?
How do you personally define your own political beliefs and where do you see yourself fitting into Heinlein's dichotomy of control versus non-control?
How do you think this quote relates to the concept of power and authority in society? Do you believe that some level of control is necessary for social order, or do you lean more towards individual freedom and autonomy?
In what ways do you think political labels and tags can influence our perceptions of others and our interactions with them? Do you think these labels are helpful or harmful in fostering understanding and cooperation among people with differing beliefs?
Reflecting on your own experiences, can you think of instances where you have encountered individuals who align more with the "control" or "non-control" mindset described by Heinlein? How have these interactions shaped your own beliefs and attitudes towards politics and society?
Similar quotes
“The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.”
“A dying culture invariably exhibits personal rudeness. Bad manners. Lack of consideration for others in minor matters. A loss of politeness, of gentle manners, is more significant than is a riot.”
“Sick cultures show a complex of symptoms such as you have named...but a dying culture invariably exhibits personal rudeness. Bad manners. Lack of consideration for others in minor matters. A loss of politeness, of gentle manners, is more significant than is a riot.”
“An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.”
“The golden sunshine of Italy congealed into tears. Here's to alcoholic brotherhood ... much more suited to the frail human soul, if any, than any other sort.”
“Thing that got me was not her list of things she hated, since she was obviously crazy as a Cyborg, but fact that always somebody agreed with her prohibitions. Must be a yearning deep in human heart to stop other people from doing as they please. Rules, laws — always for other fellow. A murky part of us, something we had before we came down out of trees, and failed to shuck when we stood up. Because not one of those people said: "Please pass this so that I won't be able to do something I know I should stop." Nyet, tovarishchee, was always something they hated to see neighbors doing. Stop them "for their own good" — not because speaker claimed to be harmed by it.”