“If we assume man has been corrupted by an artificial civilization, what is the natural state? the state of nature from which he has been removed? imagine, wandering up and down the forest without industry, without speech, and without home.”
Jean-Jacques Rousseau raises thought-provoking questions in this quote regarding the concept of the natural state of man. He questions what the true essence of humanity is when stripped of the constructs of civilization. Rousseau imagines a scenario where man exists in a state of nature, devoid of industry, language, and permanent shelter. The quote challenges readers to reflect on the impact of society on the purity of human nature and what it means to exist in a state of true simplicity. It invites contemplation on the essence of humanity and the role of civilization in shaping human behavior.
In this quote by Rousseau Jean-Jacques, he raises the question of what the natural state of man would be if removed from the constraints of civilization. This concept of the "state of nature" has modern relevance as we grapple with the impacts of technology, urbanization, and societal norms on our true human nature.
“If we assume man has been corrupted by an artificial civilization, what is the natural state? the state of nature from which he has been removed? imagine, wandering up and down the forest without industry, without speech, and without home.” - Rousseau Jean - Jacques
In reflecting on Rousseau's idea of man being corrupted by civilization, it is crucial to consider what he considers as the natural state of humans. This thought experiment challenges us to contemplate what a human existence would look like without the influence of society and technology. Here are some questions to ponder:
“As soon as any man says of the affairs of the State "What does it matter to me?" the State may be given up for lost.”
“I hear from afar the shouts of that false wisdom which is ever dragging us onwards, counting the present as nothing, and pursuing without pause a future which flies as we pursue, that false wisdom which removes us from our place and never brings us to any other.”
“An unbroken horse erects his mane, paws the ground and starts back impetuously at the sight of the bridle; while one which is properly trained suffers patiently even whip and spur: so savage man will not bend his neck to the yoke to which civilised man submits without a murmur, but prefers the most turbulent state of liberty to the most peaceful slavery. We cannot therefore, from the servility of nations already enslaved, judge of the natural disposition of mankind for or against slavery; we should go by the prodigious efforts of every free people to save itself from oppression. I know that the former are for ever holding forth in praise of the tranquillity they enjoy in their chains, and that they call a state of wretched servitude a state of peace: miserrimam servitutem pacem appellant. But when I observe the latter sacrificing pleasure, peace, wealth, power and life itself to the preservation of that one treasure, which is so disdained by those who have lost it; when I see free-born animals dash their brains out against the bars of their cage, from an innate impatience of captivity; when I behold numbers of naked savages, that despise European pleasures, braving hunger, fire, the sword and death, to preserve nothing but their independence, I feel that it is not for slaves to argue about liberty.”
“Every man having been born free and master of himself, no one else may under any pretext whatever subject him without his consent. To assert that the son of a slave is born a slave is to assert that he is not born a man.”
“ The spectacle of nature, by growing quite familiar to him, becomes at last equally indifferent. It is constantly the same order, constantly the same revolutions; he has not sense enough to feel surprise at the sight of the greatest wonders; and it is not in his mind we must look for that philosophy, which man must have to know how to observe once, what he has every day seen." Jean Jacques Rousseau, On the Inequality among Mankind, Ch. 1, 20.”
“In truth, laws are always useful to those with possessions and harmful to those who have nothing; from which it follows that the social state is advantageous to men only when all possess something and none has too much.”