“Each Javelin round costs $80,000, and the idea that it's fired by a guy who doesn't make that in a year at a guy who doesn't make that in a lifetime is somehow so outrageous it almost makes the war seem winnable.”
In today's world, the quote by Sebastian Junger holds true as it highlights the stark economic disparities between those who are on the frontlines of war and those who make decisions from afar. The exorbitant cost of military equipment raises questions about the allocation of resources and the true human costs of warfare.
In this quote by Sebastian Junger, the author emphasizes the absurdity of the financial costs of warfare, specifically referring to the high price of Javelin rounds. Junger highlights the stark contrast between the cost of the weapon and the economic means of those utilizing it. This juxtaposition serves to underscore the disproportionate distribution of resources within conflicts and questions the morality of such disparities.
In this quote by Sebastian Junger, he highlights the irony and absurdity of the vast cost difference between a single Javelin round and the financial circumstances of the individuals deploying it.
Example: "Each Javelin round costs $80,000, and the idea that it's fired by a guy who doesn't make that in a year at a guy who doesn't make that in a lifetime is somehow so outrageous it almost makes the war seem winnable." - Sebastian Junger
Reflecting on the quote by Sebastian Junger, consider the following questions:
“The cause doesn't have to be righteous and battle doesn't have to be winnable; but over and over again throughout history, men have chosen to die in battle with their friends rather than to flee on their own and survive.”
“Society can give its young men almost any job and they'll figure how to do it. They'll suffer for it and die for it and watch their friends die for it, but in the end, it will get done. That only means that society should be careful about what it asks for. ... Soldiers themselves are reluctant to evaluate the costs of war, but someone must. That evaluation, ongoing and unadulterated by politics, may be the one thing a country absolutely owes the soldiers who defend its borders.”
“Maybe the ultimate wound is the one that makes you miss the war you got it in.”
“The state's case against Smith, however, did claim to speak to his actual guilt or innocence, and it has to be considered carefully. The reason this is important has nothing to do with Roy Smith or Bessie Goldberg or even Al DeSalvo; they're all dead. In some ways there is nothing less relevant than an old murder case. The reason it is important is this: Here is a group of people who have gathered to judge--and possibly execute--a fellow citizen. It's the highest calling there is, the very thing that separates us from social anarchy, and it has to be done well. A trial, however, is just a microcosm of the entire political system. When a democratic government decides to raise taxes or wage war or write child safety laws, it is essentially saying to an enormous jury, "This is our theory of how the world works, and this is our proposal for dealing with it. If our theory makes sense to you, vote for us in the next election. If it doesn't, throw us out." The ability of citizens to scrutinize the theories insisted on by their government is their only protection against abuse of power and, ultimately, against tyranny. If ordinary citizens can't coolly and rationally evaluate a prosecutor's summation in a criminal trial, they won't have a chance at calling to task a deceitful government. And all governments are deceitful--they're deceitful because it's easier than being honest. Most of the time, it's no more sinister than that.”
“War is a lot of things and it's useless to pretend that exciting isn't one of them.”
“War is life multiplied by some number that no one has ever heard of.”