“The common understanding among Muslims, no doubt indoctrinated by Western notions, is that a secular state is a state that is not governed by the 'ulama', or whose legal system is not established upon the revealed law. In other words it is not a theocratic state. But this setting in contrast the secular state with the theocratic state is not really an Islamic way of understanding the matter, for since Islam does not involve itself in the dichotomy between the sacred and the profane, how then can it set in contrast the theocratic state with the secular state?”
Explore This Quote Further
Quote Analysis:
In this quote by Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, the author challenges the common understanding of a secular state in the context of Islamic principles. He argues that Islam does not distinguish between the sacred and the profane, and therefore the dichotomy between theocratic and secular states is not applicable in an Islamic framework.
By stating that Islam does not involve itself in the dichotomy between the sacred and the profane, al-Attas is highlighting the unique perspective of Islamic teachings on governance and law. This challenges the common notion that a secular state is simply one that is not governed by religious authorities or established upon religious laws. Instead, al-Attas suggests that Islam offers a different perspective on the relationship between religion and the state that transcends these traditional categories.
Modern Relevance:
In this quote by Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, he challenges the common understanding among Muslims regarding the concept of a secular state. He questions the dichotomy between the sacred and the profane that is inherent in Western notions of secularism, and argues that Islam does not conform to this separation. This challenges Muslims to reconsider their understanding of secularism and how it relates to Islamic principles in the modern world.
Quote by Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas
"The common understanding among Muslims, no doubt indoctrinated by Western notions, is that a secular state is a state that is not governed by the 'ulama', or whose legal system is not established upon the revealed law. In other words it is not a theocratic state. But this setting in contrast the secular state with the theocratic state is not really an Islamic way of understanding the matter, for since Islam does not involve itself in the dichotomy between the sacred and the profane, how then can it set in contrast the theocratic state with the secular state?" - Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas
Reflection Questions
This quote by Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas challenges the common understanding of a secular state among Muslims. It raises questions about the Islamic perspective on the dichotomy between the sacred and the profane, and how it relates to the concept of a theocratic state versus a secular state. Consider the following reflection questions: 1. How does the Islamic perspective on the sacred and profane influence the idea of a theocratic state? 2. In what ways can a secular state be compatible with Islamic principles, despite not being governed by the 'ulama' or the revealed law? 3. How can Muslims reconcile their understanding of governance with Western notions of secularism, while staying true to their religious beliefs?
Similar quotes
“The secularizing 'values' and events that have been predicted would happen in the Muslim world have now begun to unfold with increasing momentum and persistence due still to the Muslims' lack of understanding of the true nature and implications of secularization as a philosophical program.”
“The International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC)... to establish a superior library reflecting the religious and intellectual traditions both of the Islamic and Western civilizations.”
“An Islamic university...structure is different from a Western University; [its] conception of what constitutes knowledge is different from what Western philosophers set forth as knowledge; [its] aims and aspirations are different from Western conceptions. The purpose of higher education is not, like in the West, to produce the complete citizen, but rather, as in Islam, to produce the complete man, or the universal man.... A Muslim scholar is a man who is not a specialist in any one branch of knowledge but is universal in his outlook and is authoritative in several branches of related knowledge.”
“Injustice, being the opposite of justice, is the putting a thing in a place not its own; it is to misplace a thing; it is to misuse or to wrong; it is to exceed or fall short of the mean or limit; it is to suffer loss; it is deviation from the right course; it is disbelief of what is true, or lying about what is true knowing it to be true. -Islam and Secularism page 78”
“Change, development and progress, according to the Islamic viewpoint, refer to the return to the genuine Islam enunciated and practised by the Holy Prophet (may God bless and give him Peace!) and his noble Companions and their Followers (blessing and peace be upon them all!) and the faith and practice of genuine Muslims after them; and they also refer to the self and mean its return to its original nature and religion (Islam).”
“But the philosophical and scientific process which I call 'secularization' necessarily involves the divesting of spiritual meaning from the world of nature; the desacralization of politics from human affairs; and the deconsecration of values from the human mind and conduct.”