“Politeness is good only in social relations, because to be polite in literary or academic [matters] would be to be dishonest. Ipinasa mo out of politeness? Our of kwan to the father or...No!”

• Working on it...

• Working on it...

Quote Analysis of Teodoro A. Agoncillo

Teodoro A. Agoncillo's assertion highlights the distinction between the social niceties of politeness and the rigorous demands of intellectual honesty. His perspective provokes deeper reflection on the roles of communication in different contexts—social versus academic or literary.

Agoncillo's statement emphasizes that while politeness serves as a social lubricant, fostering smooth interpersonal interactions, it can become a hindrance to genuine discourse in scholarly or literary settings. When he questions "Ipinasa mo out of politeness?" he is challenging the idea of submitting work or opinions merely to appease social expectations rather than to present authentic viewpoints. This perspective underscores the importance of integrity in academic contributions, suggesting that merely being polite in one's work may dilute the truth or authenticity of the message.

Moreover, by contrasting social relationships with academic ones, Agoncillo seems to advocate for a more forthright and honest exchange of ideas in intellectual realms. Such a stance invites scholars and writers to prioritize clarity and truth over superficial cordiality, thus maintaining the integrity of their contributions.

In summary, Agoncillo's quote serves as a reminder that while politeness is valuable in fostering goodwill among individuals, it holds less relevance in the pursuit of truth and knowledge, where honesty and sincerity must prevail.

Modern Relevance of Agoncillo's Perspective on Politeness

Teodoro A. Agoncillo's assertion about the nature of politeness raises important points about honesty and authenticity in various contexts. In today's world, where communication often occurs in both personal and professional realms, the tension between being polite and being truthful remains significant.

In social settings, politeness can serve as a bridge, fostering connections and granting people the ability to express themselves without offense. However, in academic and literary discussions, prioritizing politeness over truth can lead to misunderstandings and hinder genuine discourse.

In the age of social media, where opinions can be amplified or diminished based on the nuances of social etiquette, the challenge lies in balancing respect and honesty. This balance is crucial for meaningful dialogue, particularly in academic circles where dissent and critique are vital for growth and innovation. Thus, Agoncillo's insights endure, urging individuals to navigate the fine line between courtesy and authenticity in a modern context.