“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Thomas Jefferson's assertion in the Declaration of Independence speaks powerfully to contemporary issues surrounding equality, governance, and individual rights. His words resonate today as societies grapple with the balance between authority and personal freedoms.
In an era marked by social movements advocating for civil rights, environmental justice, and political reform, the idea that "all men are created equal" serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle against discrimination and inequality. Current advocacy for marginalized communities reflects the necessity of recognizing and securing "unalienable Rights" for all.
Furthermore, Jefferson’s critique of governments that become "destructive" aligns with modern discussions about accountability and the right of citizens to challenge and reform institutions. As people worldwide demand transparency and ethical governance, the call to "alter or abolish" a government that fails to protect its people highlights the importance of civic engagement and activism.
The notion that it is the "duty" of the populace to resist oppressive regimes remains pertinent, especially in the context of authoritarianism, surveillance, and abuses of power identified across many nations. The sentiment that "evils are sufferable" captures the challenging choice faced by individuals between enduring injustice and taking action to invoke change.
In summary, Jefferson's words not only remind us of historical struggles for independence but also provide a lens through which to examine and navigate today's political and social challenges. The enduring principles of equality, consent, and the right to seek happiness continue to inspire movements for a fairer and more just society.
Thomas Jefferson's quote from the Declaration of Independence encapsulates the foundational principles of American democracy and individual rights. This excerpt lays bare the philosophical underpinnings of a government that is meant to serve its people, emphasizing equality, inherent rights, and the responsibility of citizens to challenge oppressive governance.
Self-Evidence of Truths:
Unalienable Rights:
Role of Government:
Right to Alter or Abolish Government:
Prudence and Stability:
Long Train of Abuses:
Jefferson's assertion frames the American quest for freedom and justice as a proactive responsibility of the citizenry. His eloquent articulation of rights, government, and the importance of action against oppression continues to resonate, serving as a cornerstone of democratic values and civic duty. This philosophy remains relevant as citizens navigate the complexities of governance and individual rights in contemporary society.
“Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”
“Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness] it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government...”
“Whereas it appeareth that however certain forms of government are better calculated than others to protect individuals in the free exercise of their natural rights, and are at the same time themselves better guarded against degeneracy, yet experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms, those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny; and it is believed that the most effectual means of preventing this would be, to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, ....whence it becomes expedient for promoting the publick happiness that those persons, whom nature hath endowed with genius and virtue, should be rendered by liberal education worthy to receive, and able to guard the sacred deposit of the rights and liberties of their fellow citizens, and that they should be called to that charge without regard to wealth, birth or accidental condition of circumstance.”
“Surely, if it is the right of the people to "alter or abolish," it is their right to criticize, even severely, policies they believe destructive of the ends for which government has been established. This principle, in the Declaration of Independence, suggests that true patriotism lies in supporting the values the country is supposed to cherish: equality, life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness. When our government compromises, undermines, or attacks those values, it is being unpatriotic.”
“The equal rights of man, and the happiness of every individual, are now acknowledged to be the only legitimate objects of government.”
“Resolved ... that it would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights: that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism — free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence;”