“There is no moral to my song,I praise no right, I blame no wrong;I tell of things that I have seen,I show the man that I have beenAs simply as a poet canWho knows himself poet and man.”
Explore This Quote Further
Analysis
In this quote by Thomas MacDonagh, the poet emphasizes his role as an observer and chronicler of life rather than a moral judge. He acknowledges his limitations as a poet in capturing the complexity of human experience, but asserts his commitment to portraying the truth as he has witnessed it. MacDonagh's declaration reflects a sense of humility and honesty in his approach to poetry, highlighting the importance of self-awareness and introspection in the creative process.
Relevance in Modern Times
In this quote by Thomas MacDonagh, the poet emphasizes the importance of portraying reality as it is and not being constrained by moral judgments. This idea holds modern relevance in a society where authenticity and individualism are valued. MacDonagh's words remind us to embrace our truths and share them without fear of judgment or limitation.
Thomas MacDonagh's Reflection on Poetry and Morality
"There is no moral to my song, I praise no right, I blame no wrong; I tell of things that I have seen, I show the man that I have been As simply as a poet can Who knows himself poet and man." - Thomas MacDonagh
Reflection Questions:
In the poem excerpt by Thomas MacDonagh, the speaker expresses a sense of neutrality and introspection in telling their story. This raises questions about the role of morality and perspective in storytelling. Reflect on the following questions:
- How does the idea of not having a clear moral in a story impact your interpretation of it?
- What do you think the speaker means by "showing the man that I have been as simply as a poet can"? How does this relate to the concept of authenticity in storytelling?
- How does the speaker's assertion that they "know themselves poet and man" influence the reader's understanding of the poem?
- Do you agree with the speaker's approach of presenting themselves without explicitly praising or blaming actions? Why or why not?
- In what ways does this poem challenge traditional narrative structures and expectations?
Similar quotes
“Show me the man you honor and I will know what kind of man you are.”
“Show me the man you honor, and I will know what kind of man you are”
“...So speaks Man-Creating. Then, instantly, it all changes, and from Man-Creating I become simply Man-Alive--a member of society, a friend and neighbor, a son and brother of the human race. And when I look at what I have done from this point of view, suddenly I feel lower than a dog. I see all the pain and anguish I have caused to people I know, and I wonder how I could have done it, and how there could possibly be any justification for it--yes, even if what I wrote had been as great as "Lear," as eloquent as "Hamlet"...For what integrity is there that is not tainted with human frailty? If only I could tell myself that every word and phrase and incident in the book had been created at the top of my bent and with the impartial judgment of unrancorous detachment! But I know it is not true. So many words came back to me, so many whip-lash phrases, that must have been written in a spirit that had nothing to do with art or my integrity. We are such stuff that dust is made of, and where we fail--we fail! Is there, then, no such thing as a pure spirit in creation?”
“Songs of myselfI am the poet of the Body and I am the poet of the Soul, The pleasures of heaven are with me and the pains of hell are with me, The first I graft and increase upon myself, the latter I translate into new tongue. I am the poet of the woman the same as the man, And I say it is as great to be a woman as to be a man,..”
“Incomprehensible is the height of your spirit both in heroical resolution and matters of conceit. Unreprievably perishes that book whatsoever to wastepaper, which on the diamond rock of your judgement disasterly chances to be shipwrecked. A dear lover and cherisher you are, as well of the lovers of Poets, as of Poets themselves. Amongst their sacred number I dare not ascribe myself, though now and then I speak English: that small brain I have to no further use I convert, save to be kind to my friends and fatal to my enemies. A new brain, a new wit, a new style, a new soul will I get me, to canonize your name to posterity, if in this my first attempt I be not taxed of presumption.”
“I have always strenuously supported the right of every man to his own opinion, however different that opinion might be to mine. He who denies to another this right, makes a slave of himself to his present opinion, because he precludes himself the right of changing it.”