“They have had their moment of freedom. Webley has only been a guest star. Now it’s back to the cages and the rationalized forms of death—death in the service of the one species cursed with the knowledge that it will die…. “I would set you free, if I knew how. But it isn’t free out here. All the animals, the plants, the minerals, even other kinds of men, are being broken and reassembled every day, to preserve an elite few, who are the loudest to theorize on freedom, but the least free of all. I can’t even give you hope that it will be different someday—that They’ll come out, and forget death, and lose Their technology’s elaborate terror, and stop using every form of life without mercy to keep what haunts men down to a tolerable level—and be like you instead, simply here, simply alive…..” The guest star retires down the corridors.”
In this quote from Thomas Pynchon's work, the speaker reflects on the fleeting nature of freedom and the oppressive systems that keep individuals, including animals, plants, and other humans, in cages. The speaker expresses a desire to set others free but acknowledges the complexities and injustices of the world that prevent true freedom. The use of language, such as "broken and reassembled" and "elaborate terror," conveys a sense of despair and hopelessness in the face of systemic oppression and manipulation. This quote highlights the theme of freedom versus captivity and the struggle for genuine autonomy in a world dominated by power and control.
The passage above, from Thomas Pynchon's work, reflects on the themes of freedom, captivity, and the exploitation of nature for the benefit of a privileged few. In today's world, these themes are more relevant than ever as we grapple with issues such as environmental degradation, income inequality, and the ethical implications of technological advancement. The extract serves as a poignant reminder of the consequences of humanity's relentless pursuit of progress and power.
In this passage from Thomas Pynchon's work, the character reflects on the limitations of freedom in a society governed by technology and the exploitation of resources. The idea of freedom is juxtaposed with the harsh reality of life, where only a select few benefit at the expense of others. The imagery of cages and the idea of being "broken and reassembled" paint a vivid picture of the struggles faced by individuals in such a society.
After reading this powerful excerpt from Thomas Pynchon's work, take some time to reflect on the themes and ideas presented. Consider the following questions:
What do you think Pynchon is trying to convey about freedom, captivity, and the human experience through this passage?
How do you interpret the idea of certain individuals being "broken and reassembled" to preserve an elite few? Do you see parallels to real-world dynamics or systems?
In what ways does the passage evoke concepts of power, control, and the manipulation of life for the benefit of a select group?
How does the imagery of cages, rationalized forms of death, and technology's terror resonate with you in today's society?
What are your thoughts on the notion of hope for a different, more equitable future, as expressed in the passage?
How does the image of the guest star retiring down the corridors leave you feeling or thinking about the larger themes at play in the text?
“All the animals, the plants, the minerals, even other kinds of men, are being broken and reassembled every day, to preserve an elite few, who are the loudest to theorize on freedom, but the least free of all.”
“Young Tchitcherine was the one who brought up political narcotics. Opiates of the people.Wimpe smiled back. An old, old smile to chill even the living fire in Earth’s core. "Marxist dialectics? That’s not an opiate, eh?""It’s the antidote.""No." It can go either way. The dope salesman may know everything that’s ever going to happen to Tchitcherine, and decide it’s no use—or, out of the moment’s velleity, lay it right out for the young fool."The basic problem," he proposes, "has always been getting other people to die for you. What’s worth enough for a man to give up his life? That’s where religion had the edge, for centuries. Religion was always about death. It was used not as an opiate so much as a technique—it got people to die for one particular set of beliefs about death. Perverse, natürlich, but who are you to judge? It was a good pitch while it worked. But ever since it became impossible to die for death, we have had a secular version—yours. Die to help History grow to its predestined shape. Die knowing your act will bring will bring a good end a bit closer. Revolutionary suicide, fine. But look: if History’s changes are inevitable, why not not die? Vaslav? If it’s going to happen anyway, what does it matter?""But you haven’t ever had the choice to make, have you.""If I ever did, you can be sure—""You don’t know. Not till you’re there, Wimpe. You can’t say.""That doesn’t sound very dialectical.""I don’t know what it is.""Then, right up to the point of decision," Wimpe curious but careful, "a man could still be perfectly pure . . .""He could be anything. I don’t care. But he’s only real at the points of decision. The time between doesn’t matter.""Real to a Marxist.""No. Real to himself."Wimpe looks doubtful."I've been there. You haven't.”
“In the trenches of the First World War, English men came to love one another decently, without shame or make-believe, under the easy likelihoods of their sudden deaths, and to find in the faces of other young men evidence of otherworldly visits, some poor hope that may have helped redeem even mud, shit, the decaying pieces of human meat... It was the end of the world, it was total revolution (though not quite in the way Walter Rathenau had announced): every day thousands of the aristocracy new and old, still haloed in their ideas of right and wrong, went to the loud guillotine of Flanders, run day in and out, on and on, by no visible hands, certainly not those of the people - an English class was being decimated, the ones who'd volunteered were dying for those who'd known something and hadn't, and despite it all, despite knowing, some of them, of the betrayal, while Europe died meanly in its own wastes, men loved. But the life-cry of that love has long since hissed away into no more than this idle and bitchy faggotry. In this latest War, death was no enemy, but a collaborator. Homosexuality in high places is just a carnal afterthought now, and the real and only fucking is done on paper...”
“It would all be done with keys on alphanumeric keyboards that stood for weightless, invisible chains of electronic presence or absence. If patterns of ones and zeroes were "like" patterns of human lives and deaths, if everything about an individual could be represented in a computer record by a long strings of ones and zeroes, then what kind of creature could be represented by a long string of lives and deaths? It would have to be up one level, at least -- an angel, a minor god, something in a UFO. It would take eight human lives and deaths just to form one character in this being's name -- its complete dossier might take up a considerable piece of history of the world. We are digits in God's computer, she not so much thought as hummed to herself to sort of a standard gospel tune, And the only thing we're good for, to be dead or to be living, is the only thing He sees. What we cry, what we contend for, in our world of toil and blood, it all lies beneath the notice of the hacker we call God.”
“I think that there is a terrible possibility now, in the World. We may not brush it away, we must look at it. It is possible that They will not die. That it is now within the state of Their art to go on forever - though we, of course, will keep dying as we always have. Death has been the source of Their power. It was easy enough for us to see that. If we are here once, only once, then clearly we are here to take what we can while we may. If They have taken much more, and taken not only from Earth but also from us - well, why begrudge Them, when they’re just as doomed to die as we are? All in the same boat, all under the same shadow … yes … yes. But is that really true? Or is it the best, and the most carefully propagated, of all Their lies, known and unknown?We have to carry on under the possibility that we die only because They want us to: because They need our terror for Their survival.”
“Most people would look at an animal in a cage and instinctively feel that it should be set free. . . . It's a dangerous world out there, filled with predators. . . . What would you prefer? A comfortable, safe, warm, cosy life in a cage, or an uncertain life of freedom.”