“The question is not whether we should or should not regulate; itis how much should we regulate and who the regulators shouldbe. We went overboard on deregulation under Reagan. UnderBush, many people lost in the casino. Now we have the Obamaadministration overreacting and overreaching with regulation thatdoes the exact opposite of wealth creation. If we are to have changewe can believe in, then we could start by replacing the majorityof the lawyers in regulatory agencies with actual experienced, successfulbusiness veterans. They would have recognized the early warningsigns of many of the financial debacles created by the bubble-bustcycle.”
Explore This Quote Further
Quote Analysis
In this quote, Ziad K. Abdelnour discusses the importance of regulation in the financial sector and the need for experienced business professionals to be involved in regulatory agencies. He argues that a balance must be struck between regulation and freedom in order to promote wealth creation. Abdelnour criticizes the deregulation that occurred under Reagan and the overreaching regulation of the Obama administration, suggesting that a more balanced approach is necessary. By advocating for the replacement of lawyers in regulatory agencies with successful business leaders, Abdelnour believes that early warning signs of financial crises could be better identified and addressed. His overall message is one of advocating for thoughtful and effective regulation in order to prevent future economic disasters.
Modern Relevance of Regulation and Wealth Creation
In this quote by Ziad K. Abdelnour, the importance of finding the right balance in regulation to promote wealth creation is highlighted. The discussion around regulation and its impact on the economy is still relevant today, especially as governments seek to find the right approach to oversee industries while fostering economic growth.
Example of Usage
"The question is not whether we should or should not regulate; it is how much should we regulate and who the regulators should be. We went overboard on deregulation under Reagan. Under Bush, many people lost in the casino. Now we have the Obama administration overreacting and overreaching with regulation that does the exact opposite of wealth creation. If we are to have change we can believe in, then we could start by replacing the majority of the lawyers in regulatory agencies with actual experienced, successful business veterans. They would have recognized the early warning signs of many of the financial debacles created by the bubble-bust cycle." - Ziad K. Abdelnour
Reflection Questions:
In the quote provided by Ziad K. Abdelnour, he discusses the balance of regulation in the financial sector and the impact it has on wealth creation. Reflecting on this statement, consider the following questions:
How do you feel about the level of regulation in the financial sector currently? Do you believe it is too much, too little, or just right?
What do you think are the potential consequences of overregulation or underregulation in the financial industry?
Do you agree with the suggestion of replacing lawyers in regulatory agencies with experienced business veterans? Why or why not?
In your opinion, what changes could be made to regulation in order to promote wealth creation while also preventing financial crises like the recent bubble-bust cycle?
How do you think the balance between regulation and free market principles should be maintained in the financial sector?
Similar quotes
“One of the advantages of living in a constitutional federal republicis that we have the ability, if not the duty, as citizens to repair orreplace those acts of legislation under which we have agreed to live.We must act when it has become evident that said legislationno longer serves us as a people or advances the principles uponwhich this nation was founded, one of these being “the pursuit ofhappiness,” which may only be secured through wealth creation.If it burdens the debt obligation of the government, it cannotbe creating wealth. If it does not advance the cause of regainingAmerican competitive dominance in the global marketplace, it is notcreating wealth. If legislation and regulation were proposed thattaught people how to fish instead of providing fish, then the unemployedwould find a way to create jobs for each other. Wealthcreation is mankind’s natural objective when given the opportunityand the tools.”
“Nations with too many laws, endless regulations, just cannot grow or generate enough jobs. Wake up...”
“I believe the crisis started when we started prioritizing redistribution of wealth instead of its creation.”
“This nation was founded on the principle of wealth creation. Asa young Henry Clay said in the House of Representatives in 1812,“It [wealth creation] is a passion as unconquerable as any with whichnature has endowed us. You may attempt to regulate—you cannotdestroy it.” That is supposed to be the federal government’s primary objective.It is supposed to promote the creation of an environment conduciveto the creation of wealth—not job creation, not bailouts, not subsidies,not expansion of the federal bureaucracy, and not providing lifetimesupport to those who choose not to take advantage of the innumerableopportunities that exist in this nation for them to create a better,more productive life for themselves.”
“Often in life we forget the things we should remember and remember the things we should forget.”
“We are in an economic war. It is a war between those who createwealth and those who believe they have some sort of divine mandateto appropriate wealth. They don’t have such an authoritative command.I don’t think they ever did. We have tried their command-andcontrolmethods for nearly a century because they said they knewbetter. It is now obvious that they didn’t.”