“The question is not whether we should or should not regulate; itis how much should we regulate and who the regulators shouldbe. We went overboard on deregulation under Reagan. UnderBush, many people lost in the casino. Now we have the Obamaadministration overreacting and overreaching with regulation thatdoes the exact opposite of wealth creation. If we are to have changewe can believe in, then we could start by replacing the majorityof the lawyers in regulatory agencies with actual experienced, successfulbusiness veterans. They would have recognized the early warningsigns of many of the financial debacles created by the bubble-bustcycle.”
Quote Analysis
In this quote, Ziad K. Abdelnour discusses the importance of regulation in the financial sector and the need for experienced business professionals to be involved in regulatory agencies. He argues that a balance must be struck between regulation and freedom in order to promote wealth creation. Abdelnour criticizes the deregulation that occurred under Reagan and the overreaching regulation of the Obama administration, suggesting that a more balanced approach is necessary. By advocating for the replacement of lawyers in regulatory agencies with successful business leaders, Abdelnour believes that early warning signs of financial crises could be better identified and addressed. His overall message is one of advocating for thoughtful and effective regulation in order to prevent future economic disasters.
Modern Relevance of Regulation and Wealth Creation
In this quote by Ziad K. Abdelnour, the importance of finding the right balance in regulation to promote wealth creation is highlighted. The discussion around regulation and its impact on the economy is still relevant today, especially as governments seek to find the right approach to oversee industries while fostering economic growth.
Example of Usage
"The question is not whether we should or should not regulate; it is how much should we regulate and who the regulators should be. We went overboard on deregulation under Reagan. Under Bush, many people lost in the casino. Now we have the Obama administration overreacting and overreaching with regulation that does the exact opposite of wealth creation. If we are to have change we can believe in, then we could start by replacing the majority of the lawyers in regulatory agencies with actual experienced, successful business veterans. They would have recognized the early warning signs of many of the financial debacles created by the bubble-bust cycle." - Ziad K. Abdelnour
Reflection Questions:
In the quote provided by Ziad K. Abdelnour, he discusses the balance of regulation in the financial sector and the impact it has on wealth creation. Reflecting on this statement, consider the following questions:
How do you feel about the level of regulation in the financial sector currently? Do you believe it is too much, too little, or just right?
What do you think are the potential consequences of overregulation or underregulation in the financial industry?
Do you agree with the suggestion of replacing lawyers in regulatory agencies with experienced business veterans? Why or why not?
In your opinion, what changes could be made to regulation in order to promote wealth creation while also preventing financial crises like the recent bubble-bust cycle?
How do you think the balance between regulation and free market principles should be maintained in the financial sector?
Similar quotes
“Our goal should be to make decision makers internalize the full consequences of their decisions, rather than prevent them from making decisions altogether [...] But we tend to reform under the delusion that the regulated institutions and the markets they operate in are static and passive, and that the regulatory environment will not vary with the cycle. Ironically, faith in draconian regulation is strongest at the bottom of the cycle, when there is little need for participants to be regulated. By contrast, the misconception that markets will govern themselves is most widespread at the top of the cycle, at the point of maximum danger to the system. We need to acknowledge these differences and enact cycle-proof regulation, for a regulation set against the cycle will not stand. To have a better chance of creating stability throughout the cycle--of being cycle-proof--new regulations should be comprehensive, nondiscretionary, contingent, and cost-effective.”
“Action seems to follow feeling, but really action and feeling go together; and by regulating the action, which is under the more direct control of the will, we can indirectly regulate the feeling, which is not.”
“Action seems to follow feeling, but really action and feeling go together; and by regulating the action, which is under the more direct control of the will, we can indirectly regulate the feeling, which is not.”
“The twentieth century was marked by two broad trends: the regulation of capitalism and the deregulation of democracy. Both experiments overreached.”
“Regulations say we have to go out. They say nothing about coming back.”