“We are social creatures to the inmost centre of our being. The notion that one can begin anything at all from scratch, free from the past, or unindebted to others, could not conceivably be more wrong.”
“We are social creatures to the inmost centre of our being. The notion that one can begin anything at all from scratch, free from the past, or unindebted to others, could not conceivably be more wrong.” - POPPER, KARL R.
This quote by Karl Popper emphasizes the fundamental aspect of human beings as social creatures and highlights the interconnectedness and influence of past experiences and relationships on our present actions and decisions.
Karl R. Popper's quote highlights the fundamental nature of human beings as social creatures. By emphasizing that our actions are always influenced by our connections to others and the past, Popper challenges the idea of complete independence or isolation. In essence, he suggests that our identities and actions are intricately linked to our relationships and history. This quote serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness of individuals within society and the impact that others have on shaping our lives.
Karl Popper's quote emphasizes the fundamental nature of human beings as social creatures. In today's interconnected world, this idea remains relevant as we continue to rely on our relationships and connections with others for support, knowledge, and growth. The belief that we can exist independently or create solely on our own is simply unrealistic. Our interconnectedness with others shapes our perspectives, beliefs, and actions, highlighting the significance of social bonds in both personal and professional contexts.
It is essential to reflect on the interconnectedness of our individual selves with the larger social fabric. Consider the following questions to deepen your understanding of how our experiences and interactions with others shape who we are:
“The history of science, like the history of all human ideas, is a history of irresponsible dreams, of obstinacy, and of error. But science is one of the very few human activities — perhaps the only one — in which errors are systematically criticized and fairly often, in time, corrected. This is why we can say that, in science, we often learn from our mistakes, and why we can speak clearly and sensibly about making progress there.”
“We all remember how many religious wars were fought for a religion of love and gentleness; how many bodies were burned alive with the genuinely kind intention of saving souls from the eternal fire of hell. Only if we give up our authoritarian attitude in the realm of opinion, only if we establish the attitude of give and take, of readiness to learn from other people, can we hope to control acts of violence inspired by piety and duty.”
“I remained a socialist for several years, even after my rejection of Marxism; and if there could be such a thing as socialism combined with individual liberty, I would be a socialist still. For nothing could be better than living a modest, simple, and free life in an egalitarian society. It took some time before I recognized this as no more than a beautiful dream; that freedom is more important than equality; that the attempt to realize equality endangers freedom; and that, if freedom is lost, there will not even be equality among the unfree.”
“There is an almost universal tendency, perhaps an inborn tendency, to suspect the good faith of a man who holds opinions that differ from our own opinions. … It obviously endangers the freedom and the objectivity of our discussion if we attack a person instead of attacking an opinion or, more precisely, a theory.”
“Our aim as scientists is objective truth; more truth, more interesting truth, more intelligible truth. We cannot reasonably aim at certainty. Once we realize that human knowledge is fallible, we realize also that we can never be completely certain that we have not made a mistake.”
“We must plan for freedom, and not only for security, if for no other reason than only freedom can make security more secure.”