“It is (to describe it figuratively) as if an author were to make a slip of the pen, and as if this clerical error became conscious of being such. Perhaps this was no error but in a far higher sense was an essential part of the whole exposition. It is, then, as if this clerical error were to revolt against the author, out of hatred for him, were to forbid him to correct it, and were to say, "No, I will not be erased, I will stand as a witness against thee, that thou art a very poor writer.”
Explore This Quote Further
Analysis of Quote by Soren Kierkegaard
In this quote, Soren Kierkegaard uses a metaphor to explore the idea of mistakes or errors in the context of writing. He suggests that just like a slip of the pen can become conscious of itself and rebel against the author, mistakes or failures in life can become sources of resistance and rebellion. The error, in this case, represents a form of defiance against the authority of the author or creator, refusing to be corrected or erased. This can be interpreted as a reflection on existential themes of individual autonomy, defiance, and the struggle against external forces.
Modern Relevance of Kierkegaard's Metaphor of the Clerical Error
Kierkegaard's metaphor of the clerical error taking on a life of its own and rebelling against the author can be seen as a poignant symbol of the complexities and challenges of communication in the digital age. In today's world, information spreads quickly and can often take on a life of its own, sometimes diverging from the original intent. The metaphor can also be applied to the power dynamics between creators and their creations, as well as the importance of owning up to mistakes and taking responsibility for one's words and actions.
Soren Kierkegaard on the rebellious nature of mistakes
"It is (to describe it figuratively) as if an author were to make a slip of the pen, and as if this clerical error became conscious of being such. Perhaps this was no error but in a far higher sense was an essential part of the whole exposition. It is, then, as if this clerical error were to revolt against the author, out of hatred for him, were to forbid him to correct it, and were to say, 'No, I will not be erased, I will stand as a witness against thee, that thou art a very poor writer.'"
Reflection Questions
In this passage, Kierkegaard presents a thought-provoking analogy of a clerical error rebelling against the author, refusing to be corrected. This raises questions about the role of mistakes and imperfections in our lives and creations. Consider the following reflection questions:
- Have you ever experienced a situation where a mistake or error turned out to be an essential part of a larger outcome?
- How do you typically respond to mistakes or imperfections in your work or personal life? Do you try to correct them or embrace them as part of the whole?
- What does Kierkegaard's analogy suggest about the relationship between creator and creation, and the potential for defiance or resistance within that dynamic?
- How might this concept of a "clerical error" refusing to be erased apply to situations of conflict or adversity in our own lives?
- Can you think of a time when a mistake or imperfection served as a reminder of your humanity or fallibility? How did you respond to this realization?
Similar quotes
“The present state of the world and the whole of life is diseased. If I were a doctor and were asked for my advice, I should reply, 'Create silence'.”
“People try to persuade us that the objections against Christianity spring from doubt. That is a complete misunderstanding. The objections against Christianity spring from insubordination, the dislike of obedience, rebellion against all authority. As a result, people have hitherto been beating the air in their struggle against objections, because they have fought intellectually with doubt instead of fighting morally with rebellion.”
“I feel as if I were a piece in a game of chess, when my opponent says of it: That piece cannot be moved.”
“If someone who wanted to learn to dance were to say: For centuries, one generation after the other has learned the positions, and it is high time that I take advantage of this and promptly begin with the quadrille--people would presumably laugh a little at him, but in the world of spirit this is very plausible. What, then, is education? I believed it is the course the individual goes through in order to catch up with himself, and the person who will not go through this course is not much helped by being born in the most enlightened age.”
“They were not unfortunate girls who, as outcasts or in the belief that they were cast out by society, grieved wholesomely and intensely and, once in a while at times when the heart was too full, ventilated it in hate or forgiveness. No visible change took place in them; they lived in the accustomed context, were respected as always, and yet they were changed, almost unaccountably to themselves and incomprehensibly to others. Their lives were not cracked or broken, as others' were, but were bent into themselves; lost to others, they futilely sought to find themselves.”
“If there were no eternal consciousness in a man, if at the bottom of everything there were only a wild ferment, a power that twisting in dark passions produced everything great or inconsequential; if an unfathomable, insatiable emptiness lay hid beneath everything, what would life be but despair?”