“There were people who’d steal money from people. Fair enough. That was just theft. But there were people who, with one easy word, would steal the humanity from people. That was something else.”
In this quote by Terry Pratchett, the distinction between physical theft and the theft of a person's humanity is explored. Pratchett suggests that while stealing money from someone is wrong, it is a different level of wrongdoing to strip someone of their humanity with just a word. This poignant observation highlights the lasting impact that words can have on a person's sense of self-worth and identity. It serves as a reminder to choose our words carefully and treat others with empathy and respect.
In today's society, where social media and online interactions play a significant role in shaping our perceptions of others, Terry Pratchett's words ring truer than ever. The power of words to dehumanize individuals, whether through cyberbullying, hate speech, or discrimination, can have a lasting impact on their sense of self-worth and dignity. Just as theft of material possessions is condemned, we must also condemn the theft of humanity through hurtful words and actions.
"There were people who’d steal money from people. Fair enough. That was just theft. But there were people who, with one easy word, would steal the humanity from people. That was something else.” - Terry Pratchett
Reflecting on this quote by Terry Pratchett, consider the following questions:
“There were plotters, there was no doubt about it. Some had been ordinary people who'd had enough. Some were young people with no money who objected to the fact that the world was run by old people who were rich. Some were in it to get girls. And some had been idiots as mad as Swing, with a view of the world just as rigid and unreal, who were on the side of what they called 'the people'. Vimes had spent his life on the streets, and had met decent men and fools and people who'd steal a penny from a blind beggar and people who performed silent miracles or desperate crimes every day behind the grubby windows of little houses, but he'd never met The People.People on the side of The People always ended up disappointed, in any case. They found that The People tended not to be grateful or appreciative or forward-thinking or obedient. The People tended to be small-minded and conservative and not very clever and were even distrustful of cleverness. And so the children of the revolution were faced with the age-old problem: it wasn't that you had the wrong kind of government, which was obvious, but that you had the wrong kind of people.As soon as you saw people as things to be measured, they didn't measure up. What would run through the streets soon enough wouldn't be a revolution or a riot. It'd be people who were frightened and panicking. It was what happened when the machinery of city life faltered, the wheels stopped turning and all the little rules broke down. And when that happened, humans were worse than sheep. Sheep just ran; they didn't try to bite the sheep next to them.”
“Lots of people would be as cowardly as me if they were brave enough.”
“Look, this is just the cemetery. It's got bylaws and things! It's not Transylvania! There's just dead people here! That doesn't make it scary, does it? Dead people are people who were living once! You wouldn't be so worked up if there were living people buried here, would you?”
“But there was more to it than that. As the Amazing Maurice said, it was just a story about people and rats. And the difficult part of it was deciding who the people were, and who were the rats.”
“People who didn't need people needed people around to know that they were the kind of people who didn't need people.”
“People who are rather more than six feet tall and nearly as broad across the shoulders often have uneventful journeys. People jump out at them from behind rocks then say things like, "Oh. Sorry. I thought you were someone else.”